Delhi excise policy case | ED rejects BRS leader Kavitha's plea to defer proceedings against her; issues fresh summons for March 20

After skipping Thursday’s summons, the Telangana MLC wrote to the ED seeking protection from arrest and summons as the case was being heard in the Supreme Court

March 16, 2023 06:13 pm | Updated 06:27 pm IST - New Delhi

Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLC K. Kavitha addresses a press conference in New Delhi on Thursday.

Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLC K. Kavitha addresses a press conference in New Delhi on Thursday. | Photo Credit: ANI

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) Thursday rejected BRS leader K. Kavitha's plea to defer proceedings against her till the Supreme Court ruling on her petition seeking protection from arrest and summons, as it issued a fresh notice to her for questioning on March 20 in the Delhi excise policy money laundering case, officials said.

The Telangana MLC sent an "authorised representative" in the morning with a six-page petition to the investigating officer of the case in Delhi stating she was skipping the March 16 summons as they explicitly does not require her to appear in person.

In the letter sent to the ED, Ms. Kavitha said: "I humbly beseech your good self that the proceedings before the Supreme Court being sacred and sacrosanct, the outcome thereof must be awaited before any further proceedings take place with respect to the subject summons."

"I once again request your good self that you may please defer the proceedings awaiting appropriate order(s) or direction(s) by the Hon'ble Supreme Court," she wrote.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to hear on March 24 the plea by Ms. Kavitha seeking protection from arrest and challenging the summons issued against her by the ED in this case.

Sources in the agency said her plea was rejected in view of the ongoing investigation which is at an important phase including the requirement of her physical and document-based confrontation with other accused arrested/involved in the case.

Ms. Kavitha has been asked to appear next week on March 20, officials said.

The 44-year-old politician was first questioned in this case on March 11 and she spent close to nine hours there, following which, she was asked to depose again on March 16.

In her letter, Ms. Kavitha spoke about her first deposition before the ED where she said she "furnished all relevant information and answered all queries to the best of my knowledge, ability and understanding".

Ms. Kavitha, however, expressed surprise and "shock" that her phone was "impounded" by the agency that day and she was not physically confronted with any arrested accused despite the agency's earlier "categoric assertion" for the same.

She also wrote to the agency that being a woman she should not be called to the ED office for questioning but this exercise should either be conducted over a video link or the investigators can visit her residence for the same.

"I, therefore, have reasons to believe and a grave apprehension that the enquiry/investigation being carried out may not have the sanctity of law and my expectation of a free, fair, or impartial enquiry or investigation has been severely impaired," she wrote.

Official sources had said that during the nine hours she spent at the ED office on March 11, she was confronted with the statements made by Hyderabad-based businessman Arun Ramchandran Pillai, an arrested accused in the case who allegedly shares close ties with her, apart from those of few others involved in the case.

The BRS MLC's statement was recorded under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Ms. Kavitha has asserted that she had done nothing wrong and alleged that the BJP-led Centre was "using" the ED as the saffron party could not gain a "backdoor entry" in Telangana.

Mr. Pillai, the ED had said, "represented the south group", an alleged liquor cartel linked to Ms. Kavitha and others that paid kickbacks amounting to about ₹100 crore to the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) to gain a larger share of the market in the national capital under the now-scrapped Delhi excise policy for 2020-21.

The "south group", according to the ED, "comprises" Sarath Reddy (promoter of Aurobindo Pharma), Magunta Srinivasulu Reddy (YSR Congress MP from Ongole Lok Sabha seat in Andhra Pradesh), his son Raghav Magunta, Ms. Kavitha and others.

The ED also alleged in Mr. Pillai's remand papers that he "represented the benami investments" of Ms. Kavitha in the case.

The BRS leader was earlier questioned by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the case.

The ED has so far arrested 12 people in the case, including former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister and AAP leader Manish Sisodia.

It has also recorded the statement of Butchi Babu, an accountant allegedly linked to Ms. Kavitha, where he said "there was political understanding between K. Kavitha and the Chief Minister (Arvind Kejriwal) and the Deputy Chief Minister (Mr. Sisodia). In that process, K. Kavitha also met Vijay Nair on March 19-20, 2021".

Mr. Nair was arrested in the case by both the ED and the CBI. Butchi Babu has been arrested by the CBI.

According to Butchi Babu's statement, Mr. Nair was "trying to impress Kavitha with what he could do in the (excise) policy".

"Vijay Nair was acting on behalf of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia," the statement recorded by the ED read.

It is alleged that the Delhi government's excise policy for 2021-22 to grant licences to liquor traders allowed cartelisation and favoured certain dealers who had allegedly paid bribes for it, a charge strongly refuted by the AAP.

The policy was subsequently scrapped and the Delhi lieutenant governor recommended a CBI probe, following which the ED registered a case under the PMLA.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.