Appointment of 5 judges recommended by Collegium likely in two days, Centre tells Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has given the Centre 10 days to clear pending transfer recommendations of High Court judges and appointments of High Court Chief Justices

Updated - February 03, 2023 03:53 pm IST

Published - February 03, 2023 01:05 pm IST - New Delhi

A view of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. File

A view of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. File | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Supreme Court on Friday recorded a submission by Attorney General R. Venkataramani that warrants of appointment of five judges to the apex court will be likely issued by February 5.

“It is happening… The five warrants of appointment are being issued… It goes to the President by evening. They will be issued,” Mr. Venkataramani said.

ALSO READ | Four Supreme Court Collegium resolutions give an insight into government’s priorities

The Collegium had recommended Rajasthan High Court Chief Justice Pankaj Mithal, Patna High Court Chief Justice Sanjay Karol, Manipur High Court Chief Justice P V Sanjay Kumar, Patna High Court judge Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Allahabad High Court judge Manoj Misra to the Supreme Court on December 13, 2022. They have been pending with the government for nearly two months.

The Collegium had further proposed Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court Rajesh Bindal and Gujarat High Court Chief Justice Aravind Kumar to the government for appointment as apex court judges on January 31. The appointment of all seven would see the court function with its full sanctioned strength of 34 judges.

“The five recommendations were made in December, we are in February… You are saying, and we have faith in you, that the warrants will be issued. That ‘it is happening’... ‘When’ is the next question,” a Bench of Justices SK Kaul and AS Oka asked the top law officer.

“By Sunday, they will be issued… it is happening,” Mr. Venkataramani said, hesitant to be pinned down to a specific day as the court hearing progressed.

ALSO READ | Necessary pushback: On the Supreme Court Collegium’s reiteration of recommendations

“’Happening, happened, will happen’... When things have not been happening for years together, we do not want you to give a date, but tell us in how many days it will happen… two days, three days, four days? There may be an ‘unexpected delay’. I am asking you on the judicial side. How many days should we record in our order? Can we say five days… You said by Sunday, we are giving you a longer leeway,” Justice Kaul asked.

“With a sense of responsibility I am saying, the five warrants will be issued. It is happening,” Mr. Venkataramani said.

“Happening ‘shortly’ then?” Justice Kaul asked.

10 days to clear High Court judge transfers

The court further put the government on an ultimatum, giving it 10 days to clear Supreme Court Collegium recommendations on transfer of High Court judges and High Court appointments, especially pending appointments of High Court Chief Justices.

“Mr. Attorney, something has greatly disturbed us, if the transfer order of judges is not implemented… what do you want us to do? If you keep them pending… you will make us take some very, very difficult decisions,” Justice Kaul said.

Mr. Venkataramani urged the court to give him more time. The court told the government not to compel it to take judicial or administrative action and make things “uncomfortable”.

“One of the Chief Justices is demitting office in 19 days, you want him to go without becoming a Chief Justice?” Justice Kaul asked.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan highlighted cases in which the government has not appointed judges despite repeated reiterations by the Collegium.

When advocate Amit Pai pointed to the “attack” made by public authorities on the judiciary, the Bench said the court is not affected beyond a particular stage by these remarks. It said the focus should be on the more important issue of filling up judicial vacancies in the courts. Mr. Pai was referring to disparaging comments made by Law Minister Kiren Rijiju about the Collegium system of judicial appointments upheld by the court in the NJAC judgment of 2015.

“We are used to handling this from all sides… It is for authorities to see what they say is appropriate or inappropriate,” Justice Kaul said.

Supreme Court Bar Association president, senior advocate Vikas Singh, conveyed the Bar’s approval of the Collegium’s four-page resolution on January 31 in which it gave no room for the government to tinker with seniority of recommended names either bifurcating them or by appointing one over the other.

“The names [five judges to the apex court] recommended earlier by the Collegium by its resolution dated December 13, 2022 shall have precedence over the two names [Justices Bindal and Kumar] recommended presently for appointment to the Supreme Court. Therefore, the appointments of five judges recommended on December 13, 2022 should be notified separately and earlier in point of time before the two judges recommended by this resolution,” the five-member Collegium headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, and including Justices Kaul, K.M. Joseph, M.R. Shah and Ajay Rastogi, had clarified in its January 31 resolution.

The court scheduled the next hearing on February 13.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.