Chronology of events in office of Chief Justice of India falling under RTI Act case

Following is the chronology of events in the case in which a five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the 2010 Delhi High Court verdict which said that the office of the Chief Justice of India falls under the ambit of RTI Act.

November 13, 2019 05:45 pm | Updated 05:54 pm IST - New Delhi

Subhash C. Agrawal, RTI activist. File

Subhash C. Agrawal, RTI activist. File


- Nov 11, 2007: RTI activist Subhash C. Aggarwal files a plea in the Supreme Court seeking information on judges’ assets.

- Nov 30: Information denied in the reply to him.

- Dec 8: First appeal filed at SC’s registry against the denial of information.

- Jan 12, 2008: First appeal dismissed by SC’s registry.

- Mar 5: Mr. Aggarwal approaches CIC.

- Jan 6, 2009: CIC asks SC to disclose information on Judges’ assets on the ground that CJI’s office comes within the ambit of RTI Act.

- Jan 17: SC moves Delhi HC against CIC order.

- Jan 19: The Delhi High Court stays CIC order; asks constitutional expert Fali S. Nariman to assist it in deciding the legal issue. Mr. Nariman declines saying he is of the view that Judges must declare their assets and he would not be able to be impartial in the case.

- Feb 26: SC says that declaration of assets by its judges to the Chief Justice are “personal” information which cannot be revealed under the RTI Act.

- Mar 17: SC says its judges not averse to declaring their assets and Parliament can enact a law pertaining to such declaration but it must be ensured that the law is not misused.

- Mar 24: HC says that Judges cannot be treated like politicians on asset declaration.

- May 1: Delhi High Court Bar Association moves impleadment application in HC saying that Judges should voluntarily declare assets.

- May 4: SC says too much transparency can affect independence of judiciary.

- May 4: HC reserves order on SC plea.

- Sep 2: Single Bench of High Court upholds CIC’s order saying that CJI’s office comes within the ambit of RTI Act and judges’ assets be made public under the transparency law.

- Oct 5: The Apex Court challenges single bench verdict before division bench.

- Oct 6: HC agrees to give an urgent hearing to the Supreme Court’s petition.

- Oct 7: HC admits the appeal and constitutes a special three-judge bench to decide the issue.

- Nov 12: HC observes that the resolution passed by the Supreme Court judges for declaring their assets to CJI is binding on them.

- Nov 13: HC reserves judgment on the appeal.

- Jan 12, 2010: HC says the office of CJI comes within the ambit of the RTI Act.

- Nov 26: Secretary General of SC and CPIO file 3 appeals against the HC and CIC orders.

- Aug 17, 2016: SC refers the matter to a Constitution bench

- Apr 4, 2019: SC reserves verdict on whether CJI’s office is public authority under RTI Act

- Nov 13: SC upholds 2010 Delhi High Court verdict , holds office of the Chief Justice of India is a public authority and falls within the ambit of RTI.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.