Bogibeel: from ‘small’ to big

The Bogibeel across Brahmaputra, opening today, was first demanded in 1977

December 24, 2018 10:06 pm | Updated 11:42 pm IST - Guwahati

The bridge is a double-deck bridge with a two-line railway track on the lower deck and a three-lane road on the upper deck.

The bridge is a double-deck bridge with a two-line railway track on the lower deck and a three-lane road on the upper deck.

India’s longest rail-road bridge that took ₹5,920 crore to build was born “small” on paper – a scribbled note in Parliament after a dramatic display of anger – 22 years ago.

The 4.94 km Bogibeel, the fourth bridge across river Brahmaputra to be inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday, was one of eight spans pursued in 1973 to ease the pressure on the 4,258-ft Saraighat Bridge on the western edge of Guwahati.

Until the Saraighat was built in 1962, the Brahmaputra was the only river in India that had not been bridged along its entire length from delta to foothills either for road or railway.

The first push for the bridge was from a citizen’s forum in eastern Assam’s Dibrugarh. In June 1977, members of the forum submitted a memorandum to Prime Minister Morarji Desai demanding the construction of the bridge at Bogibeel, about 17 km downstream of the town.

But the bridge found no takers in New Delhi until it dramatically made its way into the Parliament less than two decades later.

 

Angry outburst

Based on another memorandum seeking the construction a bridge connecting Dibrugarh and Dhemaji, five MPs of the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) had a detailed project report prepared for Bogibeel soon after their election in 1996.

But the Railway Board said the estimated project cost – ₹2,000 crore – was too much for a small State like Assam. The AGP parliamentarians, nevertheless, sought Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda’s support for the bridge they said would be crucial for communication and internal security of India’s easternmost part.

The AGP was part of the United Front government that Mr. Deve Gowda headed. Party’s Birendra Prasad Baishya was the Minister of Steel and Mines while Muhiram Saikia was Minister of State for Human Resources Development.

“I lost my temper when Bogibeel was missing from the Budget proposal at the Cabinet meeting prior to the Railway Budget during the Parliament session in September 1996. I told the PM and Ram Vilas Paswan (then Railway Minister)... they ignored us,” Mr. Baishya told The Hindu on Monday.

Mr. Deve Gowda placated Mr. Baishya by asking Mr. Paswan to settle the Bogibeel issue. Moments later, Mr. Paswan had a brief meeting with AGP parliamentarians.

“He said it was too late to incorporate Bogibeel in the Railway Budget, but advised us to hand over a note with the request for a ‘small bridge’ during the presentation for reading out loud,” Mr. Baishya.

Hitting hard

The off-the-script announcement placed the bridge in the Parliament records. Two days later, Mr. Paswan found out that the bridge he had announced was massive, not small. The scale of the project, Mr. Baishya recalled, had hit the Railway Minister hard at a meeting with the AGP members and the Railway Board chairman.

But Bogibeel was accommodated in the Prime Minister’s special package and Mr. Deve Gowda laid its foundation stone at Dhemaji on January 22, 1997. Work, though, started after another round of initiation ceremony by his successor Atal Bihari Vajpayee in April 2002.

But the bridge missed several deadlines. Its project’s cost hence shot from ₹1,767 crore to ₹5,920 crore.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.