BJP slams Khurshid’s ‘impotent’ remark on Modi

Updated - November 16, 2021 06:31 pm IST

Published - February 26, 2014 01:10 pm IST - New Delhi

Refusing to back down, External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid repeated on Wednesday that he believed the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi, was “politically” impotent as he had failed to prevent the Gujarat carnage in 2002. The BJP took strong exception to the Minister’s choice of words.

Slamming Mr. Khurshid, Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley accused Union Ministers of using “foul language” to grab “airtime.”

“Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde has an ever smiling face. He is a man known for his courteous behaviour. Surprisingly, he has chosen to threaten the electronic media, which he finds is no longer government-friendly,” Mr. Jaitley said in a statement. “External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid is normally pleasant and courteous. He is, however, a different man when he visits his constituency Farrukhabad.”

Congress leaders, Mr. Jaitley continued, are frustrated as their party now “faces public hostility” and the “day of reckoning” draws close.

BJP spokesperson Shahnawaz Hussain said Mr. Khurshid had forgotten both his “tehzeeb and tameez” (etiquette and manners), and that his language violated both Indian culture and ethos.

On his part, Mr. Khurshid said he saw nothing wrong in his description of Mr. Modi: “I am not his doctor. I cannot physically examine him. So I have no business saying what his physical condition is. The word impotent is used in political vocabulary to indicate that somebody is incapable of doing something.”

The Minister’s defence comes a day after he said in a speech in Farrukhabad: “We don’t accuse you (Modi) of killing people. Our accusation is that you are impotent. You couldn’t stop the killers.”

Mr. Khurshid said either Mr. Modi should say that he was “strong and fully capable and what had happened was done deliberately” or admit that he had made a lot of effort “but did not have the capability [to stop the riots].”

“If there is no capability [to deal with] what is it called? Is it not called impotency? If it is called impotency, then what’s the problem?” the Minister asked.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.