Bilkis Bano case: Supreme Court adjourns to July 17 hearing of pleas against remission to convicts

The Gujarat government had raised preliminary objections to the petitions filed in the matter other than the one by Bilkis Bano

Published - July 11, 2023 07:27 pm IST - New Delhi

 The Supreme Court has posted the matter for hearing on July 17 due to paucity of time. File.

 The Supreme Court has posted the matter for hearing on July 17 due to paucity of time. File. | Photo Credit: PTI

The Supreme Court on July 11 adjourned to July 17 the hearing of a batch of pleas challenging the remission granted last year to all the 11 convicts in the gang-rape case of Bilkis Bano and murder of seven of her family members during the 2002 post-Godhra Gujarat riots.

A bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Prashant Kumar Mishra noted, in accordance with its May 9 order, notices have been published in local newspapers, including those in Gujarati and English, against the convicts who could not be served (the notice).

The Supreme Court then posted the matter for hearing on July 17 due to paucity of time.

Also read | Bilkis Bano case convicts playing for time: Supreme Court judge K.M. Joseph

The top court had earlier ordered publication of notices in local newspapers against the convicts who could not be served notices, including the one whose house the local police found locked and his phone switched off.

The Centre and the Gujarat government had told the court they are not claiming any privilege and not filing any plea for a review of the court's March 27 order, asking for production of the original records with regard to the remission granted to the convicts.

The Gujarat government had raised preliminary objections to the petitions filed in the matter other than the one by Bilkis Bano, saying it will have wide ramifications as every now and then third parties will approach courts in criminal cases.

On April 18, the top court had questioned the Gujarat government over the remission granted to the 11 convicts, saying the gravity of the offence should have been considered, and wondered if there was any application of mind.

Asking for the reasons for the premature release of the convicts, the Supreme Court had also questioned the frequent parole granted to them during their incarceration. "It [remission] is a kind of grace, which should be proportional to the crime," it had said.

The Centre and the Gujarat government had then told the court that they might file a plea seeking a review of its March 27 order, asking them to be ready with the original files on the grant of remission.

The Supreme Court had on March 27 termed Bilkis Bano's gang- rape and the murder of her family members during the riots a "horrendous" act, and asked the Gujarat government whether uniform standards, as followed in other murder cases, were applied while granting remission to the convicts.

It had sought the responses of the Centre, the Gujarat government and others on the plea filed by Bilkis Bano, who has challenged the remission.

All 11 convicts were granted remission by the Gujarat government and they walked free on August 15, 2022.

PILs were filed by CPI(M) leader Subhashini Ali, independent journalist Revati Laul, former vice-chancellor of Lucknow University Roop Rekha Verma and Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra against the release of the convicts.

Bilkis Bano was 21 years old and five months pregnant when she was gang-raped while fleeing the horror of the communal riots that broke out after the Godhra train-burning incident in which 59 Hindu pilgrims returning from Ayodhya were killed in an act of arson. Her three-year-old daughter was among the seven family members killed in the riots.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.