Action sought against five persons for vitiating Supreme Court proceedings of Chandrababu Naidu’s case

They logged into chat box of live streaming of the proceedings of Special Leave Petition in skill development scam case on October 10 and posted messages that amounted to denigrating the Majesty of Justice, complains Advocate-on-Record

Published - October 11, 2023 08:06 pm IST - VIJAYAWADA

Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record (AoR) D. Siva Rami Reddy has complained to Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud, seeking action against five persons who logged into the live streaming of the proceedings pertaining to TDP national president N. Chandrababu Naidu’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) in skill development scam case on October 10 and posted messages in the chat box that amounted to denigrating the Majesty of Justice.

He also requested the CJI to pass appropriate orders on the usage of chat box and emojis during the live streaming of court proceedings to ensure that they were not disturbed. 

Mr. Siva Rami Reddy said that the streaming of the proceedings of the Supreme Court through video-conference links had been of great convenience to the travelling advocates and party-in- persons/ AoRs.

The CJI has been nudging the High Courts to switch to hybrid hearing mode and comply with the e-Courts mandate. But, the misuse of these facilities by unscrupulous elements was causing a lot of trouble, he said. 

Referring to the live streaming of the hearing of Mr. Naidu’s case, the above mentioned individuals flooded the chat box with messages, despite warnings from the court master not to post emojis or switching on the camera. 

The messages were in support of the appellant (Mr. Naidu) and cast aspersions on the government of Andhra Pradesh and berated Chief Minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy. 

This act (of posting messages) was unwarranted and vitiated the court atmosphere. The decency and decorum of the court proceedings and the Supreme Court was tarnished by the comments and messages. Therefore, the CJI should take action suo motu against Harish Madipati, Sushmita and Nalluri Sumanth and two others whose identities were concealed. 

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.