This story is part of
From suo motu to judgment: The arguments for and against triple talaq
SHOW MORE 29 STORIES

Historic day for Muslim women: Shayara Bano on triple talaq verdict

August 22, 2017 08:49 pm | Updated 11:42 pm IST - Lucknow

Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan’s co-founder Zakia Soman speaks to the media in New Delhi

Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan’s co-founder Zakia Soman speaks to the media in New Delhi

For Shayara Bano, the original petitioner in the triple talaq case, the Supreme Court’s verdict setting aside the unilateral practice was nothing short of a personal triumph.

“I have felt the pain of having my home broken. I don’t want other women to feel that way. It is a historic day for Muslim women,” exclaimed Ms. Bano, moments after the Court declared its judgment on triple talaq.

Though she regularly faced domestic harassment, after 13 years of marriage and two children, Ms. Bano’s life was shattered in October 2015 when she received a speed post from her husband, Rizwan Ahmed, a property-dealer based in Allahabad. The letter contained a pronouncement of instant triple divorce — talaq, talaq, talaq.

In 2016, spurred by the activism against triple talaq, Ms. Bano approached the Supreme Court with the demand that the ‘talaq-e-biddat’ pronounced by her husband be declared as void. She also contended that such an unilateral, abrupt and irrevocable form of divorce be declared unconstitutional.

Ms. Bano welcomed the SC’s verdict with the belief that it would bring justice to Muslim women, married or unmarried, who either bore the pain of triple talaq or lived in constant fear of it. The judgment would “give Muslim women freedom from the misuse of triple talaq,” she said.

Like Ms. Bano, Aafreen Rehman from Jaipur was also overjoyed at the verdict.

“I am very happy with the decision. It is a positive way forward,” said Ms. Rehman, also a petitioner in the SC.

Ms. Rehman, who was married in August 2014, was also divorced through triple talaq communicated to her through post. Though she is “yet to overcome the pain,” the verdict has brought her a new sense of hope.

Ms. Rehman says she now wants the government or Court to install “women-friendly” clauses into the procedure of divorce, based on the concept of mutual consent.

“If marriage happens with the consent of two people, then how can divorce be one-sided?” she asked.

Petitioners and women activists involved in the legal battle against triple talaq hailed the SC’s verdict.

Zakia Soman, one of the petitioners and co-founder of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan, which was at the forefront of the campaign, described the verdict as “historic” and “music to the ears” of Muslim women.

“It is the most forward-looking judgment in independent India,” said Ms. Soman, who is based in Mumbai.

Ms. Soman said she would now campaign for “a procedure to be laid down in consonance with the Talaq-e-Ahsan” form of divorce, in which the husband and wife maintain a 90-day separation period to validate the divorce called by the man.

“The 90-day period is not just for the sake of it. It is to give time to both parties to negotiate, and most importantly for the woman to have a say, to be duly compensated and provided for, if the divorce happens,” she said.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.