/>

Peculiarities of personal laws should be protected: Jamiat

It tells SC that practices of marriage and divorce like polygamy, triple talaq warrant no interference from courts

Published - December 03, 2016 08:26 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Getting rid of the ‘peculiarities’ of the Islamic personal law will be akin to enforcing the Uniform Civil Code by judicial process, Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, a prominent Islamic organisation, told the Supreme Court.

The peculiarities of personal laws should be protected to secure freedom of religion and practices of marriage and divorce like polygamy, triple talaq and ‘nikah halala’ warrant no interference from courts,

Counter-affidavit

In a counter-affidavit filed in the Supreme Court recently, Jamiat has said the personal law of Islam is neither local nor regional. It has an aura of certainty as it is “primarily based on the Holy Koran and the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad, explained and applied by various scholars of great antiquity and authority after thorough research.”

The Jamiat was responding to a batch of petitions seeking to abolish personal law practices like triple talaq as discriminatory to Muslim women and unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court had itself triggered the flurry of litigation after taking suo motu cognisance of whether Islamic practices of marriage and divorce were a source of suffering and discrimination to women.

“In personal laws, new concepts of modern times should not be evolved by the courts,” the Jamiat said.

‘Greater dignity’

Referring to the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, the affidavit said it had highlighted that Muslim women should be allowed to be governed by Muslim Personal Law instead of local customs and practices because the Muslim Personal Law treats “women with greater dignity.”

The Muslim body said women who had approached the apex court should move regular civil courts, seeking adjudication of validity of divorce granted to them in the light of the law already settled by the Supreme Court.

“Muslim women enjoy greater freedom as there is no compulsion on the wife to remarry the same man or to contract any further marriage at all,” the affidavit said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.