Why not a SIT probe into black money: court

March 18, 2011 12:15 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 03:56 am IST - New Delhi

The Supreme Court  while hearing a petition asked the govt. to consider forming a SIT to investigate the black money issue. Photo: V.V. Krishnan

The Supreme Court while hearing a petition asked the govt. to consider forming a SIT to investigate the black money issue. Photo: V.V. Krishnan

Taking note of the magnitude of the black money issue, the Supreme Court on Friday asked the Union government to consider the setting up a special investigation team (SIT) to probe various aspects of the matter.

A Bench of Justices B. Sudershan Reddy and S.S. Nijjar, hearing a petition filed by the former Union Law Minister, Ram Jethmalani, relating to the Centre's inaction in retrieving black money stashed away abroad, asked Solicitor-General (SG) Gopal Subramaniam to explain the Centre's stand in this regard on the next date of hearing, which would be March 28.

Earlier, the Bench, which on Thursday cancelled the bail granted to Pune-based Hasan Ali Khan, clarified that on the completion of the four-day custodial interrogation, Hasan Ali would be remanded in judicial custody.

The Bench gave the clarification when senior counsel Uday Lalit, appearing for Ali, wanted know what Ali's position would be after the four-day police custody. Justice Reddy told Mr. Lalit that since the trial court's order granting bail was stayed, Ali would have to be remanded in judicial custody after four days of custodial interrogation.

When Mr. Subramaniam sought time to file a response to the petitioner's submissions, Justice Reddy said, “We are not talking about one case but [the] many cases [which] are involved in it. This is much wider. We want to get to the bottom of the matter. Do you have any objection if an SIT is constituted? You see the magnitude of the matter; the Enforcement Directorate would not be able to handle it alone. An SIT can be constituted with members from the CBI, the Income-Tax (I-T) Department and the Enforcement Directorate (ED). You consult Mr. Anil Divan [senior counsel] for the petitioner and come up with its possible composition. You need not tell the names in the court.” The SG said the ED was conducting a thorough probe and the constitution of an SIT might not be necessary at this stage.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.