Revoke ban on Nirbhaya documentary: Editors Guild

It says the film portrays courage, sensitivity

Updated - November 16, 2021 05:15 pm IST

Published - March 07, 2015 12:48 am IST - NEW DELHI

A screenshot of the documentary.

A screenshot of the documentary.

The Editors Guild of India on Friday urged the government to revoke the ban on the film India’s Daughte r to enable people to view “what is a positive and powerful documentary touching on the freedom, dignity and safety” of women.

The documentary was aired on BBC’s Channel 4 on Thursday evening and has been available online since then despite the government securing a court injunction on its screening across media platforms in the country.

In a statement, the Guild found no merit in the government claiming that the film could not be shown because the subject of the documentary — the Nirbhaya gang rape that shook India in the winter of 2012 — is sub judice. “To raise the issue of sub judice now at the stage of final appeal in the Supreme Court and seek to still discussion is absurd. Judges, particularly those in the Supreme Court, are by training and temperament immune to the happenings in the public sphere outside the court, and it is an insult to the Supreme Court to suggest that the airing of the convict’s perverted views would tend to interfere with the course of justice,” the Guild said.

Describing the ban as “wholly unwarranted” and based on a misunderstanding of the power and message behind the documentary, the Guild noted that the film portrays the courage, sensitivity and liberal outlook of a family traumatised by the brutality inflicted on the daughter, the continuing shameful attitudes towards women among the convict and the educated, including lawyers, besides multiple voices in support of women’s freedom and dignity.

Pointing out that the Supreme Court itself has advocated “the broadest freedom to express even the most unacceptable of views,” the Guild said the message that emerged from the documentary was such that it would make people re-examine their own attitudes and the attitudes of people around them.

The Guild’s statement also takes note of the fact that the government seems to have taken the proscription route on the basis of initial expressions of outrage — including by members of Parliament — and without viewing the film in its entirety. “The rationale that the ban was in the interests of justice and public order as the film ‘created a situation of tension and fear amongst women’ and as that the convict would use the media to further his case in the appeal that was sub judice seems to be an afterthought.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.