Jayalalithaa must be granted bail: Jethmalani

Arguing for the former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, he pleaded in the Karnataka High Court for suspension of the sentence by the Special Court.

October 07, 2014 03:21 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:32 am IST - Bangalore

Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, arguing for grant of bail to AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa in the Karnataka High Court on Tuesday, cited the bail for Lalu Prasad Yadav in the fodder scam case. File photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

Senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, arguing for grant of bail to AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa in the Karnataka High Court on Tuesday, cited the bail for Lalu Prasad Yadav in the fodder scam case. File photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

Jailed AIADMK chief J Jayalalithaa must be granted immediate bail pending hearing of her appeal against the verdict of the Special Court convicting her in the disproportionate assets case, senior counsel Ram Jethmalani appearing for her told the Karnataka High Court on Tuesday.

Arguing for the former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, Jethmalani pleaded for suspension of the sentence by the Special Court which had sent her to four years in jail.

Jethmalani pleaded for suspending the sentence pending appeal under Section 389 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Under Section 389, pending any appeal by a convicted person, the Appellate Court may order that the execution of the sentence or order appealed against be suspended. Also, if the person is in confinement, that he or she be released on bail, or on own bond.

The “regular practice” was to give bail, Jethmalani told Justice A V Chandrashekhara, who took up the matter which was posted for today by the vacation bench on October 1.

Jethmalani cited the Lalu Prasad case in the fodder scam, in which he appeared for him, to press for bail for Jayalalithaa, who is lodged at Parapana Agrahara central prison here since September 27.

The High Court had refused bail in the Lalu case but it was granted by the Supreme Court, he said.

Jethmalani also said appeals should be heard within a reasonable period of time.

He said there was nothing disclosed in the conduct of the Jayalalithaa to show that she might abscond.

Criticising the judgment of the Special Court in the Rs 66.65 crore disproportionate case, he said assets prior to the period between 1991 and 1996 (when Jayalalithaa was Chief Minister) could not be taken into account.

Matters in favour of the accused must be treated with equal importance, he said. The accused must stand a chance unless the prosecution can prove that it is absolutely false.

The court then adjourned for a break.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.