Sri Lanka slams ‘external initiatives’ at HRC

Such moves will ‘polarise our society’

September 14, 2021 10:20 pm | Updated 10:20 pm IST

G.L. Peiris

G.L. Peiris

Sri Lanka on Tuesday said it rejects “any external initiatives” established by UN mechanisms, envisaged in the resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council in March, claiming that domestic processes are “vigorously addressing” questions of accountability and justice lingering from the civil war years.

The March 2021 UN resolution on Sri Lanka , adopted with 22 of the 47 member-states of Council backing it, underscored the “persistent lack of accountability of domestic mechanisms”, and decided to strengthen the capacity of the Office of the High Commissioner to “collect, consolidate, analyse, and preserve” information and evidence and to develop strategies for future accountability processes for gross violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in Sri Lanka.

Delivering a statement a day after the UN Human Rights Chief’s oral update on Sri Lanka, in which she sought “close attention” on, and “concrete actions” from Sri Lanka, Foreign Minister G.L. Peiris said external initiatives “will polarise our society”.

“The Council must adhere to its founding principles. External initiatives embarked upon without the cooperation of the country concerned cannot achieve their stated goals, and will be subject to politicisation,” he noted, adding that Sri Lanka is “committed to achieving tangible progress on the entire range of issues” relating to accountability, reconciliation, human rights, peace and sustainable development.

Govt. initiatives

The Minister further outlined initiatives taken by the Rajapaksa administration, in regard to enforced disappearances, reparations, reconciliation efforts and institutional reform. Survivors of the country’s 30-year-long civil war have repeatedly stated that the existing domestic mechanisms are yet to inspire faith, or deliver on past promises on truth, accountability and justice.

Minister Peiris also pointed to a Cabinet sub-committee tasked with evaluation and possible reform of the country’s anti-terrorism law, widely criticised as “draconian”. In her oral update on Monday, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet sought “an immediate moratorium” on the use of the Act, and “a clear timeline” for its comprehensive review or repeal.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.