Judge dismisses sexual harassment lawsuit against Wynn Resorts

Their decision to stay anonymous was one reason the judge dismissed the case, arguing the nine women hadn’t legally justified the need to stay anonymous to continue their case.

Published - July 18, 2020 11:57 am IST - Las Vegas

File photo of Steve Wynn's properties Encore, left, and Wynn Las Vegas, right, on the Vegas Strip.

File photo of Steve Wynn's properties Encore, left, and Wynn Las Vegas, right, on the Vegas Strip.

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by nine women who alleged they were sexually harassed by former casino mogul Steve Wynn .

The women, manicurists and makeup artists in a salon at the Wynn Las Vegas, were unnamed in the lawsuit and instead identified by their attorneys as Judy Doe No. 1 through Judy Doe No. 9.

Their decision to stay anonymous was one reason the judge dismissed the case in a Wednesday filing, arguing they hadn’t legally justified the need to stay anonymous to continue their case.

They sued the Wynn Las Vegas and Wynn Resorts Ltd., alleging that the companies did not do enough to prevent a hostile work environment. They alleged that the companies were aware of misconduct by Mr. Wynn towards female employees but did not investigate it and covered up any reported misconduct.

Mr. Wynn, 78, resigned in February 2018 as chairman and chief executive of Wynn Resorts. He has consistently denied sexual misconduct allegations, which were first reported in January 2018 by the Wall Street Journal .

Mr. Wynn was not named as a defendant in the women’s lawsuit.

In the order dismissing the lawsuit, Judge James C. Mahan agreed with another judge’s earlier ruling that the women did not sufficiently justify their need to file their lawsuit anonymously using pseudonyms.

The women said in court filings that they chose to file anonymously because of fear of legal retaliation by Mr. Wynn, potentially being ostracised in their workplace and sensitive details that would upend their lives if made public.

The judge also said the women did not sufficiently make their case in the complaint, using generalised and vague statements without individualized factual support for their allegations. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, which means it can be refiled.

Phone and email messages seeking comment from the women’s attorneys, Wynn Resorts and attorneys for Wynn Resorts were not immediately returned Friday night.

The lawsuit was originally filed in a Nevada court in September 2019 but was moved to a federal court a month later.

Wynn Resorts paid a $20 million fine in February 2019 to settle a Nevada gambling regulatory probe of claims that executives failed to investigate sexual misconduct claims against Mr. Wynn before he resigned. Massachusetts gambling regulators then levied a $35 million fine against the company two months later for failing to disclose years of allegations of sexual misconduct against Mr. Wynn.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.