Pakistan Senate seeks abolition of Islamic council

The Senate committee’s recommendations follow the recent scandalous suggestions made by the council.

July 01, 2016 10:47 pm | Updated October 18, 2016 02:16 pm IST - New Delhi:

The Pakistan Senate Functional Committee on Human Rights has sought the dissolution of the constitutionally crafted Council of Islamic Ideology (CCI) on the grounds that several of its actions were inimical to the interests of women.

The Senate committee’s recommendations follow the recent scandalous suggestions made by the council, including an approval of “light beating of the errant wives by their husbands”.

It is not the first time the Council has provoked anger among civil and human rights activists, thanks to its penchant to make recommendations (though not mandatory) which adversely impact the women as well as the minorities in Pakistan.

Some of its rulings are that DNA tests were not acceptable as primary evidence in rape cases and a model bill prohibiting mixing of genders in schools, hospitals and offices. While the Council has been proactive in taking cognisance of complaints under the dreaded blasphemy law , it has refused to entertain pleas for measures to punish those who file false complaints under the law.

Constitutional body

It is a constitutional body, founded during the regime of another military ruler Ayub Khan in 1962, mandated with responsibility for giving legal advice on Islamic issues to the government and the Parliament.

Arguing in favour of its abolition, the Pakistan Senate committee has observed the Council is no longer constitutionally bound to send reports to Parliament for legislation — its final report was filed in 1997.

It also suggested the Council’s Rs100 million annual allocation be redirected to the National Commission for the Status of Women.

Taking note of the Senate Committee recommendation, the Pakistan English daily Dawn, in an editorial on Friday, noted: “Although it is known to flood the airwaves with distorted interpretations of religious and cultural norms, the CII’s recommendations are not constitutionally binding. In a democratic polity, legislators must ensure laws impacting women are passed through parliamentary consensus.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.