Abbas seeks U.N. deadline to end Israeli occupation

Palestinian President says return to negotiations with Israel would be ‘naïve at best’

Updated - November 16, 2021 07:00 pm IST

Published - September 28, 2014 12:40 am IST - UNITED NATIONS:

The Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, accused Israel on Friday of failing to negotiate in good faith, said any return to negotiations would be “naïve at best” and called on the Security Council to press for a specific deadline to end Israeli occupation.

“It is impossible and I repeat — it is impossible — to return to the cycle of negotiations that failed to deal with the substance of the matter and the fundamental question,” Mr. Abbas said at the annual session of the General Assembly, reading from a prepared text but visibly enraged. “The time has come to end this settlement occupation.”

Short on details

His speech, however, was short on details. He did not offer his own specific deadline for an Israeli withdrawal, as some had expected, nor did he say anything about joining the International Criminal Court (ICC), which his aides have repeatedly said he is prepared to do. He only hinted obliquely that he would seek accountability for alleged war crimes against Palestinians during the latest war with Israel.

“In the name of Palestine and its people, I affirm here today: We will not forget and we will not forgive, and we will not allow war criminals to escape punishment,” Mr. Abbas said in his 30-minute address.

Mr. Abbas has been threatening to join the international court ever since Palestine won upgraded status as a nonmember observer state of the United Nations in November 2012, which permits membership in many related world bodies.

Israel is worried in particular about Palestinian membership to the international court because it could open the way for the prosecution of Israeli political and military leaders for building settlements and other policies related to its decades-old occupation.

Israel and the United States have expressed strong opposition to Palestinian membership in the international court and have asserted that talks between the two sides remains the best way to achieve a two-state solution to the protracted conflict.

The conspicuous absence of a direct reference to the international court in Mr. Abbas’ speech suggested that he was still reluctant to take that step.

The Palestinian president has been seeking to bolster his authority in the aftermath of the 50-day Gaza war this summer between Israel and Hamas, the militant group that, unlike Abbas, refuses to recognize Israel’s right to exist.

Hamas’ popularity

Despite the devastation in Gaza from that war, Hamas’ popularity as a force that would stand up to Israel has increased among Palestinians.

The fighting this summer damaged more than 100 U.N. schools and hospitals, which the Israeli authorities said were near Hamas holdouts. The United Nations said 2,150 Palestinians, including 500 children, were killed. On the Israeli side, 67 soldiers and six civilians, including one child, were killed.

A fragile ceasefire agreement, negotiated in Cairo, has held for a month, and the two sides last week agreed to let reconstruction materials move into Gaza, monitored by the United Nations to ensure that they are destined for civilian projects. Israel has repeatedly said that cement and steel are diverted by Hamas to build tunnels to attack Israel.

Israel’s demand that Gaza be demilitarised is among the topics left for future cease-fire negotiations.

Palestinian diplomats have been pushing their Arab country peers at the United Nations to propose a Security Council resolution that would detail a time frame for ending Israeli occupation and call for talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority to demarcate the borders of two independent states. No resolution has yet been proposed, and the United States has said nothing about whether it intends to support it. U.S. diplomats have repeatedly said they want both sides to return to negotiations.

Mr. Abbas described the Israeli occupation as “an abhorrent form of state terrorism and a breeding ground for incitement, tension and hatred.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.