PMC case: HDIL chairman, son in police custody till October 9

EOW tells court detailed investigation is needed to prevent financial catastrophe

October 05, 2019 01:58 am | Updated 03:33 am IST - Mumbai

In legal tangle:  HDIL's Rakesh Wadhawana and his son Sarang Wadhawan (right) being produced in the Esplanade Court on Friday.

In legal tangle: HDIL's Rakesh Wadhawana and his son Sarang Wadhawan (right) being produced in the Esplanade Court on Friday.

Housing Development Infrastructure Limited’s (HDIL) chairman Rakesh Kumar Wadhawan and his son, managing director Sarang Wadhawan, were on Friday been remanded to police custody till October 9 in the case connected to major financial irregularities at the Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank.

‘Big magnitude scam’

The Economic Offences Wing (EOW), while seeking police custody of the two, said a detailed investigation was necessary considering the magnitude of the scam. The EOW said HDIL availed of 70% of depositors’ money as loans through 21,049 fictitious accounts.

HDIL's Rakesh Wadhawana and his son Sarang Wadhawan (in picture) produced in Esplanade Court on Friday.

HDIL's Rakesh Wadhawana and his son Sarang Wadhawan produced in Esplanade Court on Friday.

 

An initial investigation by the Reserve Bank of India revealed that directors of PMC Bank, in connivance with others, had replaced suspicious 44 loan accounts with 21,049 fictitious bank accounts whose individual balances were low.

According to the EOW, the banking software was tampered with to mask the 44 accounts allegedly linked with the HDIL, hiding them from the care banking system.

HDIL accounted for nearly 73% of the bank’s total loans. Out of the ₹4355.46 crore in loans under the scanner, ₹2145.78 crore was transferred to accounts held by Rakesh Kumar and his son. An account belonging to. Mr Kumar had a balance of ₹2008.62 crore on August 31, 2019, said the EOW officers.

Only a chosen few employees allegedly close to the bank’s former managing director Joy Thomas knew about these accounts.

The agency sought 14 days of their custody and said, “Initial scrutiny of financial statements indicated diversion and misappropriation of funds in large amounts and it requires to be interrogated with both accused in order to prevent a further financial catastrophe.”

Senior counsel Amit Desai who represented the Wadhawans, opposed police custody, saying his clients wanted to repay the money and that sending them to police custody will hamper the liquidation process as well as affect deposits.

‘Custody necessary’

Mr. Desai said 49 land parcels were lying with the bank, and that fixed deposits worth ₹158 crore were processed.

The additional chief magistrate at the Esplanade Court, however, deemed that custody interrogation of the Wadhawans was necessary.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.