Mumbai HC lets Dabholkar intervene in PIL for CBI probe

March 24, 2014 05:59 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 09:26 pm IST - Mumbai

The Bombay High Court on Monday allowed Mukta Dabholkar, daughter of the slain rationalist Narendra Dabholkar, to intervene in a public interest litigation seeking a CBI probe into the murder.

Ms. Dabholkar is seeking investigation by a Special Investigating Team, drawn from various probe agencies, claiming the probe was not making headway for the past six months.

Dabholkar, a well-known anti-superstition activist, was shot dead by unknown assailants in Pune on August 20 last year. No arrest has been made in the case so far by police.

The bench headed by Justice P.V. Hardas allowed the petition on Monday. To the court’s question about the status of the investigation, the government’s lawyer only said that Pune police were still probing the case.

Former journalist Ketan Tirodkar has filed the PIL seeking a CBI inquiry.

The crime was not against an individual but the ideology of the secular state. A fresh perspective was needed into the probe as it was not making headway for the past six months, Ms. Dabholkar’s application said.

Dabholkar spent his life combating superstition and irrationality. His violent death was a reminder of the depths to which discourses around culture had fallen in the state, the application said.

Ms. Dabholkar’s application said that her family felt that some precautions against political interference in the investigation were necessary due to the nature of the crime and in view of the upcoming elections.

Mr. Tirodkar had earlier sought a probe by the National Investigation Agency, but later he amended the petition and demanded a CBI probe.

Pune police had informed the court that there was no evidence suggesting involvement of right-wing extremists in the killing, contrary to Mr. Tirodkar’s contention.

ACP Rajendra Bhamare of Pune police had also denied in his submission that his team was under pressure from any political party or group, and said the case did not fall in the purview of NIA.

NIA took the same stand in the HC, saying that it cannot probe the murder as the crime fell under the Indian Penal Code and was not covered by the NIA Act.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.