Bombay High Court grants bail to union worker charged with UAPA

Justice Bharati Dangre was hearing a bail plea filed by Mr Singapanga, who has been working as a workman in Reliance Energy for the last 20 years since 1997.

May 08, 2021 05:14 pm | Updated 10:31 pm IST - Mumbai

 A view of the Bombay High Court.

A view of the Bombay High Court.

 

The Bombay High Court recently granted bail to Saidulu Singapanga, worker of the registered Mumbai Electric Employees Union, arrested in 2018 and accused of being a member of a terrorist organization and charged with the several provisions of the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).

Justice Bharati Dangre was hearing a bail plea filed by Mr Singapanga, who has been working as a workman in Reliance Energy for the last 20 years since 1997.

On January 1, 2018, information was received by the anti-naxal operations that some persons are working for a terrorist organization, Communist Party of India (Maoist) and will organize a secret meeting with the intention of causing threat to the Nation’s solidarity and security and they are involved in unlawful activities like collecting funds, recruiting new members, propagating organisation’s anti national philosophy, organizing meetings of their active members, making lodging arrangements for organization’s office bearers.

A team was deputed and a person was arrested who named Mr Singapanga and few others. Soon he was arrested and charged with several sections of the UAPA section 13 (punishment for unlawful activities), 16 (punishment for terrorist act), 18 a (punishment for organising of terrorist camps), 18b (punishment for recruiting of any person or persons for terrorist act), 19 (punishment for harbouring) and 20 (punishment for being member of terrorist gang or organisation), 38 (offence relating to membership of a terrorist organisation), 39 (offence relating to support given to a terrorist organisation), 40 (offence of raising fund for a terrorist organisation) of UAPA and 465 (punishment for forgery) and 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating) of the Indian Penal Code

Advocates Sudeep Pasbola and Susan Abraham appearing for him argued that he was not named in the FIR and he was arrested much later after the crime was registered and on his arrest, nothing incriminating was seized from him.

It was pointed out by them that Mr Singapanga was roped in as a mistaken identity in place of Saidulu Gondrigalla, who has been charge-sheeted in some departmental proceedings by the Reliance Energy Group and that he is not the same person.

The court said, “I do not, prima facie , see the material sufficient to indict Mr Singapanga under all the aforesaid mentions sections of UAPA. He need not languish in prison any more in the wake of the material compiled against him. The material also does not indicate any act which causes or intended to cause disaffection against India.”

The bench granted him bail on a bond of ₹50,000 and held, “I do not prima facie see the material sufficient to indict Mr Singapanga as a member of a terrorist gang or an organization or supporting a terrorist organization.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.