Assess impact of junkyard expansion on flamingos: HC

Court seeks report on Kanjurmarg plant from NEERI, BNHS

February 27, 2020 01:33 am | Updated 01:33 am IST - Sonam Saigal Mumbai

Winged visitors: Thane creek, which is a haven for flamingos, is near the solid waste treatment plant at Kanjurmarg.

Winged visitors: Thane creek, which is a haven for flamingos, is near the solid waste treatment plant at Kanjurmarg.

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday directed two expert bodies — the National Environmental Engineering and Research Institute (NEERI) and the Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) — to assess the impact of the solid waste treatment plant at Kanjurmarg on the nearby Thane creek which is home to flamingos. They have been asked to submit a report in two weeks.

A Division Bench of acting Chief Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari and Justice N.R. Borkar was hearing a petition filed by NGO Vanshakti challenging the validity of the environment clearance that was granted to Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to expand its solid waste treatment plant from its current 65 hectares to 121 hectares.

Vanshakti had contended that the expansion of the facility violated the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) notification of 2011 which prohibited setting up new or expanding existing solid waste treatment plants in CRZ areas, and also violated the Wetland (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017, and provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) Act. The notification also called for setting up of solid waste treatment plants outside CRZ areas.

On September 19, 2019, a Bench of HC had stayed the environment clearance to BMC granted in October 2018 and had accepted the petitioners’ contention that SC had ordered declaration of 10-km around national parks and wildlife sanctuaries as eco-sensitive zones. However, in December 2019 another Bench had lifted the stay stating that the site at Kanjurmarg was the only place where solid waste from the city was being treated scientifically.

Vanshakti then moved SC against this order. On February 14 this year SC referred the issue back to HC asking it to reconsider and decide on the PIL quickly observing that a report from an expert body would be appropriate before taking a final decision.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.