Six years after newborn’s death, couple gets justice

Doctors’ negligence proved; Rs.13 lakh compensation awarded

Updated - September 23, 2016 03:33 am IST

Published - January 28, 2016 12:00 am IST - Bengaluru:

Six years after their newborn died due to medical negligence at a private hospital in the city, Wing Commander Vivek Puttanna and his wife Rashmi B.T. have finally found some solace with a consumer forum awarding them Rs.13 lakh compensation, and the Karnataka Medical Council issuing a warning to the two doctors responsible for their “negligence”.

The 4th Additional District Consumer Redressal Forum, Bengaluru, in its January 1, 2016 order, has directed Fortis Hospital, Bannerghatta Road, and two gynaecologists — Latha Venkataraman and Prabha Ramakrishna — to jointly pay Rs.10 lakh compensation with six per cent interest from 2011 (Rs.13 lakh in total) to the “agonised” couple.

The forum also directed the hospital to refund Rs. 2.59 lakh, which the couple had to pay towards expenses.

KMC’s warning

After conducting a separate inquiry, the Karnataka Medical Council (KMC) issued a statutory warning to both Dr. Venkataraman and Dr. Ramakrishna.

KMC held that Dr. Venkataraman did not assess the mother for vaginal birth after caesarean-section (VBAC) and allowed the delivery even though many factors did not favour VBAC. The Council also found that she had violated the law by not registering her post-graduate qualification.

Dr. Ramakrishna was ‘warned’ by KMC for not monitoring the mother properly and for not taking a timely decision to do caesarean-section. “This could have prevented rupture of uterus and the neonatal death,” the KMC order said.

What happened?

Ms. Rashmi approached Dr. Venkataraman for the delivery of her second child in January 2009, and the doctor found her suitable for VBAL as she had given birth to her first child through caesarean-section in 2004. The doctor, an expert in difficult deliveries, promised Ms. Rashmi that she would personally handle her delivery.

The due date was February 26, 2009, but the delivery did not happen. An ultrasound scan, done on March 3, 2009, showed that the “foetus was health, fully developed and weighed 4,072 grams.”

However, Ms. Rashmi began experiencing uterine contraction in the early hours of March 4, 2009, and was admitted to Fortis Hospital as per the doctor’s prior advice.

It was alleged that Dr. Venkataraman visited her in the hospital only for a brief period at around 7.15 a.m. that day. Later, Dr. Ramakrishna handled the case, and Dr. Venkataraman returned to the hospital after the baby was removed through caesarean-section.

Several medical complications, including an indication of foetal asphyxia and uterine rupture, cropped up and Ms. Rashmi was in pain from 7.15 a.m. to 1.50 p.m. The baby was removed through caesarean-section only at around 2.33 p.m. due to delays in decision making and failure to keep the operation theatre on standby.

It was alleged that though the baby did not cry or breathe after the removal, the limp body was kept in ICU on ventilator, and removed on March 16. All the allegations were denied by the hospital.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.