Granite scam: complainants depose before Sagayam panel

Officials from PWD and Department of Land Reforms grilled

February 03, 2015 12:00 am | Updated April 02, 2016 02:15 am IST - MADURAI:

plaints continue:Legal Commissioner U. Sagayam enquiring a farmer about his complaints of illegal granite quarrying in Keezhavalavu, in the city on Monday.— Photo: R. Ashok

plaints continue:Legal Commissioner U. Sagayam enquiring a farmer about his complaints of illegal granite quarrying in Keezhavalavu, in the city on Monday.— Photo: R. Ashok

As part of the ongoing probe into the illegal granite scam, the High Court-appointed Legal Commissioner, U. Sagayam, on Monday began his sixth phase of enquiry here. He conducted enquiry with two persons who had earlier lodged different complaints against illegal quarrying in Melur region.

The Editor of a Tamil daily, Dinaboomi, P. Manimaran, who was summoned by the one-member panel, deposed before him.

“I have already given all the evidences I had with me to the panel. Today, I was formally questioned in the issue,” Mr. Manimaran told reporters after the enquiry. Mr. Manimaran said that six cases were foisted against him after he raked up the illegal granite mining issue during the previous Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Government.

He said he had sent his detailed complaint about the issue to the Chief Minister’s Cell after AIADMK came to power.

Later, a farmer V.R. Thangaraj, said that he complained about certain technical illegalities in transfer of lease by one of the granite quarry operators to the name of another at Keezhavalavu. He also complained about the quarry operator destroying a huge hillock beyond the area permitted for quarrying.

“A temple which the local villagers had been worshipping for generations was destroyed, despite the Collector having had ordered to spare that particular portion,” he said.

Officials from the Public Works Department and Department of Land Reforms too were grilled during the enquiry held in the afternoon.

Those summoned were asked to give details about the nature of complaints, action taken by officials, material evidence supporting their claims. They were also asked about whether they faced any intimidation or were attacked following their complaints.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.