Tahir Hussain’s plea challenging remand infructuous, ED tells HC

He has been handed over to Tihar jail authorities on expiry of his three-day ED custody.

September 10, 2020 11:38 pm | Updated September 11, 2020 08:51 am IST - New Delhi

New Delhi: Suspended AAP councillor Tahir Hussain (C) leaves from Sunlight Police Station to produce at Karkardooma Court, in New Delhi, Friday, March 6, 2020. Hussain is accused of being involved in the killing of Intelligence Bureau (IB) staffer Ankit Sharma (26), who was found dead in a drain near his home in northeast Delhi's riot-hit area. (PTI Photo)(PTI06-03-2020_000185B)

New Delhi: Suspended AAP councillor Tahir Hussain (C) leaves from Sunlight Police Station to produce at Karkardooma Court, in New Delhi, Friday, March 6, 2020. Hussain is accused of being involved in the killing of Intelligence Bureau (IB) staffer Ankit Sharma (26), who was found dead in a drain near his home in northeast Delhi's riot-hit area. (PTI Photo)(PTI06-03-2020_000185B)

The Enforcement Directorate has informed the Delhi High Court on Thursday that the plea by suspended AAP councillor Tahir Hussain challenging his three-day remand in a money laundering case related to the north-east Delhi riots has become ‘infructuous’ as he has been sent to judicial custody now.

The ED said Mr. Hussain’s plea need not be heard now as he has been handed over to the Tihar jail authorities on expiry of his three-day ED custody. The submission came on Mr. Hussain’s plea seeking to set aside the remand order of September 7, passed by a trial court and a direction to the ED to immediately send him to Tihar jail.

Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, representing the ED, said the trial court’s September 7 order clearly says that the accused be handed over to Tihar jail authorities on September 10, and the agency has complied with the direction.

Mr. Hussain’s counsel opposed the submission of ED and said he is on the point of law and his prayer is to set aside the trial court’s order. Justice Yogesh Khanna posted the case for hearing on November 24.

The ED was probing the allegation that Mr. Hussain and his linked persons laundered about ₹1.10 crore funds by using purported shell or dummy companies to fuel the protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the riots.

Mr. Hussain’s counsel challenged the trial court’s extension of remand order on the ground that the 15-day period for grant of police custody has to begin from the date of formal arrest, that is, August 20 and thus, further extension of police remand is not permissible in law.

“Trial Court has erred in deciding the abovesaid application. It is held by the Supreme Court of India in a catena of judgments that 15 days period for grant of police custody has to begin from the date of formal arrest i.e 20.08.2020 and thus, further extension of police remand is not permissible in law,” his petition stated.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.