High Court sets aside arbitral award imposed on DMRC

HC gave liberty to both DMRC and DAMEPL to invoke an arbitration clause for fresh adjudication.

Published - January 21, 2019 01:57 am IST - New Delhi

The Delhi High Court has partly set aside an arbitration award directing Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) to pay over ₹2,700 crore to a consortium headed by Reliance Infrastructure Ltd for breach of an agreement between them.

A Bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna (now a Supreme Court judge) and Justice Chander Shekhar had “set aside the award except to the extent we have upheld the conclusion of the Arbitral Tribunal on the question of waiver”.

The consortium was a successful bidder in the international competitive bidding process for construction, operation and maintenance of the Delhi Airport Metro Express Line based on PPP model for providing high-speed metro connectivity between New Delhi railway station and IGIA Terminal 3 with further line till Sector 21 in Dwarka.

Reliance Infrastructure subsidiary, the Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL), had later pulled out from running the Airport Express Line with effect from July 2012 in view of cracks and defects in the girders, bearings, etc.

Subsequently, the matter was referred to arbitration. An Arbitral Tribunal had in its May 2017 award accepted DAMEPL’s claim that running of operations on the line was not viable due to structural defects. The tribunal had held that the DMRC was liable to pay over ₹2,700 crore as termination payment. In March 2018, a single-judge Bench of the High Court had upheld the award and rejected the objections filed by the DMRC.

However, the Division Bench last week held that “award of ₹2782.33 crore to DAMEPL…as termination payment…is set aside and quashed”.

The Bench said: “The Arbitral Tribunal ignored and did not consider the vital evidence of certification for commercial operations accorded by the CMRS while deciding the question of civil structure faults and in holding that no effective steps to cure the defects were taken.

The court gave liberty to both the DMRC and DAMEPL to invoke an arbitration clause for fresh adjudication.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.