ED files first chargesheet in Delhi Jal Board money-laundering case

March 30, 2024 04:05 pm | Updated 04:05 pm IST - New Delhi

A file photo of the logo of the Enforcement Directorate 

A file photo of the logo of the Enforcement Directorate  | Photo Credit: PTI

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed its first chargesheet in connection with a money-laundering probe linked to alleged irregularities in the Delhi Jal Board (DJB), official sources said on March 30.

The about 8,000-page-long prosecution complaint, which includes 140 operational pages apart from annexures, was filed by the federal agency before a special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Delhi on March 28, sources told PTI. The court has listed the matter for April 1 for taking cognisance of the chargesheet, they said.

Former DJB chief engineer Jagdish Kumar Arora, contractor Anil Kumar Agarwal, former NBCC general manager D K Mittal, one Tejinder Singh and NKG Infrastructure Limited have been named as the accused in the charge sheet. The agency has sought prosecution of these accused under the PMLA and informed that it might file supplementary complaints in the future.

Also read: DJB bribes partially passed on to AAP as election funds: ED

The ED has alleged that bribe money generated from corruption in a contract issued by the DJB was "passed on" as election funds to the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Delhi. The agency had also summoned Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for questioning in the case, but he did not depose before it.

Watch | What was the New Delhi Excise Policy all about, and why is Arvind Kejriwal in trouble

Mr. Kejriwal was arrested by the ED on March 21 in another money-laundering case linked to alleged irregularities in the Excise policy for the national capital.

The agency had raided the premises of Mr. Kejriwal's personal assistant Bibhav Kumar, AAP's Rajya Sabha MP and treasurer N.D. Gupta, former DJB member Shalabh Kumar, chartered accountant Pankaj Mangal and some others as part of the probe in February.

An FIR lodged by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which accuses Mr. Arora of awarding a DJB contract to NKG Infrastructure Limited for a total cost of ₹38 crore even though the company "did not meet" the technical eligibility criteria, is the basis of the ED case.

The ED arrested Mr. Arora and Agarwal in the case on January 31. NKG Infrastructure Limited bagged the contract by submitting "forged" documents and Mr. Arora "was aware of the fact that the company does not meet the technical eligibility", the agency has claimed.

An ED statement has alleged that Mr. Arora "received" bribe in cash and in bank accounts after awarding the contract to NKG Infrastructure Limited and "passed on" the money to various people managing the DJB affairs, including "persons connected with the AAP".

"Bribe amounts were also passed on as election funds to the AAP," the federal agency has alleged.

This is the second case in which the ED has charged the AAP with taking kickbacks. It has alleged that bribe money of ₹45 crore, out of the total of ₹100 crore, from the scrapped Excise policy of 2021-22 was used by the AAP for campaigning in the Goa Assembly polls.

The agency has said the DJB contract was awarded at "highly-inflated rates", so that the bribes could be collected from the contractors. "As against the contract value of ₹38 crore, only about ₹17 crore were spent towards the contract and the remaining amount was siphoned off in the guise of various fake expenses. "Such fake expenses were booked for bribes and election funds," the ED has alleged.

Delhi minister Atishi had denied the charges at a press briefing and claimed that the case was another attempt to tarnish the image of the AAP and its leaders.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.