Delhi HC discharges journalist Gurumurthy in contempt case

He had tweeted criticising the decision of a Bench led by Justice Muralidhar in granting interim protection to Congress leader Chidambaram’s son Karti in INX Media case

July 13, 2023 08:32 pm | Updated 08:33 pm IST - New Delhi:

S. Gurumurthy, Editor of Thuglak, Tamil weekly magazine. File

S. Gurumurthy, Editor of Thuglak, Tamil weekly magazine. File | Photo Credit: S.R. Raghunathan 

The Delhi High Court on Thursday discharged S. Gurumurthy, the editor of Tamil weekly magazine Thuglak, in a 2018 contempt case initiated against him for his tweet against Justice S. Muralidhar, who was then a judge of the Delhi High Court and currently Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court.

The High Court noted that Mr. Gurumurthy had earlier appeared before the court voluntarily and expressed remorse.

“…after considering the facts and circumstances, we accept S. Gurumurthy’s apology for the subject incident and consider it appropriate to discharge the show-cause notice issued to him in the present contempt petition. He accordingly stands discharged,” a Bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Gaurang Kanth said.

The High Court was hearing a plea by the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) seeking punishment for Mr. Gurumurthy for his tweets criticising the decision of a Bench led by Justice Muralidhar in granting interim protection to Congress leader P. Chidambaram’s son Karti in the INX Media case.

During the hearing, the DHCBA’s counsel submitted that the apology expressed by Mr. Gurumurthy and his statement that he has highest respect for judiciary, and in all humility he was truly sorry for any offence that may have been caused, be accepted as having purged the alleged contempt.

“Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease. Unnecessarily dragging an honourable judge’s name in all the controversy, it is reported all the time,” the High Court observed.

“You think we rely on newspaper reports and tweets for our dignity? As we have said it in many judgments before, our dignity rests on a surer footing. We are not dependent on criticism, fair or unfair, for our dignity,” Justice Mridul observed orally.

On previous hearings in April this year, senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, appearing for Mr. Gurumurthy, stated that his client had already tendered his apology in relation to the subject “tweet”. Mr. Gurumurthy, however, stated that there was no necessity for him to file an additional affidavit expressing an unconditional apology in clear terms.

In October 2019, the High Court had dropped contempt proceedings against Mr. Gurumurthy in another case for having re-tweeted an article against Justice Muralidhar.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.