‘No tug-of-war if same party runs Delhi, Central govts’

In the past a simple request from State to Centre got things moving, Dhavan tells SC

Updated - November 17, 2017 11:19 am IST

Published - November 16, 2017 09:53 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Rajeev Dhavan

Rajeev Dhavan

After days of legal arguments before a Constitution Bench on the power tussle between Centre and the Delhi government, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan said on Thursday that the tug-of-war would not have taken place had the same party been in power at the Centre as well as in Delhi.

Appearing for the Delhi government before the five-judge Bench led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Mr. Dhavan said that in the past when the same party was in power at the Centre and in Delhi, a “simple request” from the State to the Union government would get things moving. Different parties in power left them at loggerheads, with the Lieutenant-Governor constantly trying to convince Delhi that he was “bigger” than its elected government.

Mr. Dhavan said the Lieutenant-Governor was bound by the aid and advice of Delhi’s Council of Ministers. “The Chief Minister is an elected head. The Council of Ministers is not nominated as in the Union Territory of Puducherry, but are elected; and only 10% of the elected representatives become Ministers,” he said.

The senior lawyer said the power of the Council of Ministers to aid and advise the Lieutenant-Governor is derived from the people. The Lieutenant-Governor could not have a difference of opinion on every matter. “Only if I [the Delhi government] cross my powers and Delhi is under threat as it was during the Jat agitation, the Lieutenant-Governor can intervene,” he said.

Mr. Dhavan said the Lieutenant-Governor does not run Delhi; he can only intervene, encourage or warn or refer a matter to the President. “How can he run the allocation of work and personnel in different departments of the government which have sub-departments? Can he say this department will have this officer? It is not his role to transfer personnel...”

However, the court asked whether the government could have such absolute executive powers.

Its powers are subject to scrutiny and difference of opinion from the Lieutenant-Governor. “They [the Council of Ministers] cannot function as they like,” the Bench said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.