From suo motu to judgment: The arguments for and against triple talaq

Supreme Court admits Muslim woman's plea to declare triple talaq illegal

The Muslim Personal Law Board has questioned the court's jurisdiction, arguing that the judiciary cannot adjudicate on personal laws.

The Muslim Personal Law Board has questioned the court's jurisdiction, arguing that the judiciary cannot adjudicate on personal laws.  

The petition argues that triple talaq, 'nikah halala' and polygamy are void and unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court on Friday took on board a petition by a West Bengal-based Muslim woman to declare the practices of ''talaq-e-bidat'' (triple talaq), ''nikah halala'' and polygamy under the Muslim personal laws illegal and unconstitutional.

A Bench of Chief Justice of India T.S. Thakur and Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud tagged the petition filed by Ishrat Jahan, a native of Howrah, with a batch of petitions filed by several Muslim women, women's rights organisations and the Supreme Court's own suo motu PIL to consider whether certain practices of marriage and divorce under the Islamic personal laws amount to gender discrimination.

The Bench issued notice to Ministries of Women and Child Development, Law and Justice, Minority Affairs, the National Commission for Women, police chiefs of Bihar and West Bengal and the woman's husband, Murtuza Ansari.

However, the Bench refused to aid Ms. Jahan find her four minor children, whom she claims to have been “taken away” by her husband after talaq'.

Instead, the Bench asked her to move a habeas corpus petition in the High Court concerned, at one point remarking that “she produced them [children]”.

In her petition, Ms. Jahan, represented by advocate V.K. Biju, contended that personal laws that validate triple talaq as a form of divorce and recognise the practices of ''nikah halala'' and polygamy were void and unconstitutional as “they are not only repugnant to the basic dignity of a woman as an individual but also violative of the fundamental rights.”

At this point, Chief Justice Thakur orally remarked that “he [a Muslim man] is entitled to have four wives and even without talaq, he can marry again.”

At this point, Mr. Biju argued that “the Constitution does not grant absolute protection to a personal law that is arbitrary or unjust, nor are personal laws exempted from the jurisdiction of the legislature or the judiciary.”

The effect of Islamic personal law on women in the community recaptured the Supreme Court's attention on October 16, 2015, when a Bench of Justices Anil R. Dave and A.K. Goel directed the registration of a PIL titled 'Muslim women's quest for equality'. The Bench ordered the PIL to be placed before an appropriate three-judge Bench for adjudication.

Subsequently, a slew of petitions were filed in the Supreme Court by Muslim women against their personal law. One of them, by Shayara Bano, said that she only wished to “secure a life of dignity, unmarred by discrimination on the basis of gender or religion.”

However, the Muslim Personal Law Board has questioned the court's jurisdiction, arguing that the judiciary cannot adjudicate on personal laws.

A letter from the Editor


Dear reader,

We have been keeping you up-to-date with information on the developments in India and the world that have a bearing on our health and wellbeing, our lives and livelihoods, during these difficult times. To enable wide dissemination of news that is in public interest, we have increased the number of articles that can be read free, and extended free trial periods. However, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do. As we fight disinformation and misinformation, and keep apace with the happenings, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering operations. We promise to deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda.

Support Quality Journalism
null
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Jun 3, 2020 9:02:21 AM | https://www.thehindu.com/news/Supreme-Court-admits-Muslim-womans-plea-to-declare-triple-talaq-illegal/article14591302.ece

In This Package
To clear the path ahead
Supreme Court sets aside instant 'talaq’
United against triple talaq, divided on legal points
Historic day for Muslim women: Shayara Bano on triple talaq verdict
Triple talaq lost staunchest support
Triple talaq: Will SC verdict end personal laws’ immunity?
The twists and turns taken during the marathon hearing on triple talaq in SC
Those who resort to instant triple talaq will be ostracised: AIMPLB
AIMPLB against triple talaq, says counsel
Triple talaq is Muslim woman vs man issue, not that of majority vs minority: Centre
Can women be given option of saying ‘no’ to triple talaq at the time of ‘nikahnama’, SC asks AIMPLB
Triple talaq a matter of faith for last 1,400 years, AIMPLB tells SC
Islamic law anglicised: Centre
Will enact divorce law for Muslims: Centre
Triple talaq hearing: ‘If God finds something sinful, can laws validate it’
Polygamy is not a religious practice, government tells Supreme Court
Ban on triple talaq will cause a vacuum: Supreme Court
Judges choose work over vacation
Constitution Bench to decide petitions on triple talaq: SC
Bench would hear debates on the ‘legal’ aspects of triple talaq.
SC is looking at triple talaq, not Uniform Civil Code: CJI
SC to examine if triple talaq is fundamental to religion
Peculiarities of personal laws should be protected: Jamiat
SC intervention in triple talaq amounts to judicial legislation: AIMPLB
Centre’s stand on triple talaq based on gender justice: Ravi Shankar Prasad
Cast asunder by triple talaq, Muslim women see hope in Supreme Court
Triple talaq is sin but Shariat permits it, says AIMPLB
Practices in each religion are unique, according to the All India Muslim
Personal Law Board.
SC can’t decide on triple talaq, says AIMPLB
You are reading
Supreme Court admits Muslim woman's plea to declare triple talaq illegal
A file photo of senior advocate Salman Khurshid.
SC seeks Khurshid’s assistance in talaq case
Next Story