‘Karna is not black or white but a mortal’

Showing Kunti’s first born in a different light, young Bangladeshi director Jayita Mahahlanobish makes a mark among the Delhi theatre audience

February 10, 2017 10:45 pm | Updated February 19, 2017 09:41 am IST

NEW INTERPRETATION A scene from “Prothom Partho”

NEW INTERPRETATION A scene from “Prothom Partho”

It was a matter of pride and pleasure for Bangladesh’s Jayita Mahahlanobish when her maiden play Prothom Partho was selected for the ongoing 19th Bharat Rang Mahotsav. Having acted in more than 20 plays besides feature films and television, Jayita was initially worried when Abdullah-Al-Mamum Theatre School, Bangladesh staged the play this week at Bharangam. The worry turned out to be unfounded as the audience received the play with warmth. Based on well-known playwright Buddhadeva Bose’s story, the central character of the play is Karna, who, born to Kunti (also called Pritha) is referred to as Prothom Partho, first child of Pritha.

Divided into three sections the story shows how Karna before the beginning of Kurukshetra war is met by Lord Krishna, Kunti and Draupadi in order to convince him to leave the Kauravas and join the Pandavas. Despite all arguments, pleadings and threats, Karna refuses, opting to stand by his friend Duryodhana. For Jayita the story goes much beyond loyalty as it highlights how a society’s prejudice and ill-treatment turns a principled and intelligent person like Karna into a villain. “Nobody is born evil it is the people’s behaviour, narrow thinking and holier than thou attitude which makes even the best succumb to favours of those who are eager to exploit their talents for vested interest,” avers Jayita. She goes on to add, “Karna is not black or white but a mortal. That is why he touches the audience.”

Jayita Mahahlanobish

Jayita Mahahlanobish

Moving to Patna to perform at the Parallel Festival of BRM, Jayita spoke about her play, how theatre is faring in Bangladesh and her new project.


What made you choose ‘Prothom Partho’ as your debut directorial venture?

I find Karna’s very fascinating. Brave, good looking, ace archer and endowed with endearing qualities yet he suffers in Mahabharat for no fault of his. Karna is a mystery wrapped in an enigma as scholars are unable to fathom him. More than this I see a parallel between his case and that of youngsters becoming extremists. Sheer neglect, deprivation and insult by society makes people become hard to the extent that they become violent and take refuge in evil. This is precisely what happened when Karna became Duryodhana’s friend. This is precisely is the subtext of Buddhadeva Basu’s story. Like his mother Kunti, Karna too faced social stigma.

What challenges did you face?

My first love has always been acting. As no one was willing to direct this play I willingly took it. Among the challenges I faced was monetary as not many were willing to back me because of my lack of experience which I understand and then short listing the actors as everybody in the Abdullah-Al-Mamum Theatre School was keen to be a part of this project. The other roadblocks are the ones which are faced by all theatre persons in my country. Lack of space for rehearsals and limited halls for staging plays.

So hiring auditoriums must be expensive?

No they are affordable but because they are so many amateur and professional groups who have several productions getting halls to be stage them is tough.

How are enactment of stories from Mahabharata viewed in Bangladesh which is Muslim dominated country?

Bangladesh is a Muslim country but its essence is secularism and it forms a part of the social fabric. Most people know these epics as they belong to the Indian subcontinent. Like any other society we too have a few who do not accept this inherent characteristic of our society but the majority who form our audience accept it. Not just this play there have many based on Mahabharata like ‘Nittopura’ by Masum Reza about Ekolabbo and ‘Madhobi’ by Ramendu Majumdar about Galob and Jojati.

Tell us about the theatre scene in Bangladesh and its role.

Ever since gaining independence in 1971 theatre in Bangladesh has grown from strength to strength. There many varieties of theatre – group theatre, repertory theatre, educational theatre etc. Most leading universities have degree courses in theatre which are very popular among the youth. Like other countries, in Bangladesh too cinema, television, internet and digital are growing in popularity among the young but they are not completely swayed by it. So thank God we still have audience which is growing (laughs).

Theatre has twin roles. At one level it is a movement which shares what the playwright and director think and believe in. It has to set the audience contemplate – who may or may not agree with what is being conveyed. What interpretation to draw is the prerogative of the viewers. At another level, theatre is a powerful tool for spreading social awareness. In Bangladesh majority of the theatre graduates get a job in NGO who take up vital issues like taking care of women during pregnancy and marrying girls after attaining 18 years through plays.

Considering religious extremism in Bangladesh how difficult is it for theatrepersons?

Religious extremism affects all and theatre being a part and parcel of the society too is affected. Till now it is free of communalism and the threats of extremism so far is less. Yes there have been cases when plays were not allowed to be staged at certain places. Like the Prachyanat production ‘Mandar’ by Rahul Anand was objected to because in it the lead character called Rahamat is abused.

One fundamental reason why theatre has remained free of communal poison is that those who established the movement in the country believed and advocated secularism and somehow that inherent quality has remained intact. Touch wood. Here I would like to add that extremists are more harsh to Muslims who are secular and protect minorities. In fact they face the brunt of their ire.

You think with bloggers and journalist being attacked there will be a fallout on theatre too?

Yes, that possibility is there since theatre is one medium which has always raised its voice against communalism and religious bigotry but I feel so long as audience support the possibility of backlash is minimum. I think most extremists do not see plays so we are kind of safe (laughs).

As a woman theatreperson from minority any particular difficulties you face

I face critical difficulties but these are same for all of us irrespective of the gender or denomination. So what I am facing or have faced are the same for all young theatre activists.

What made you choose acting as a profession?

My father and aunts were all fond of literature and theatre. One pishima (paternal aunt) Nita Mahahlanobish a voice over artist in radio used to take me see plays.

Once on the stage I moved to television and films too but my first and last love is theatre. I am very comfortable on stage and find its live action a powerful attraction.

Films and TV are director’s medium but stage is solely that of actors.

Your next project?

Drawing inspiration from the historical movement in 18th Century when Bishnois sacrificed their life to save trees I am making a street play wherein the pollution due to setting up of a coal-based thermal plant in Sunderbans will be highlighted.

The name of the play is ‘Chipko’.

Top News Today


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.