SC notice to EC on plea to cross-verify EVM and VVPAT counts

The petitioner argued for a complete count of VVPAT slips as opposed to current practice of verification of only five randomly selected EVMs through VVPAT paper slips

April 01, 2024 09:46 pm | Updated April 18, 2024 03:57 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Photo used for representation purpose only.

Photo used for representation purpose only. | Photo Credit: The Hindu

The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Election Commission (EC) on a writ petition seeking a direction to mandatorily cross-verify the count in Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) with votes verifiably recorded as cast by counting all Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) slips.

A Bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta tagged the petition filed by lawyer and activist Arun Kumar Agrawal, represented by advocate Neha Rathi, with pending ones on the same issue.

Also Read | Lok Sabha elections LIVE updates 

Ms. Rathi argued for a complete count of VVPAT slips in elections as opposed to the current practice of verification of only five randomly selected EVMs through VVPAT paper slips.

The petition further challenged the EC’s guideline that mandated sequential VVPAT verification, that is, one after the other, causing undue delay.

The petition proposed simultaneous VVPAT verification by deploying more personnel for counting in each constituency. “This would allow VVPAT verification to be done in five to six hours,” the plea claimed.

Also read: Cross-verification of EVM votes with VVPAT slips: SC asks EC to check reports of EVMs registering ‘extra votes’

It noted that while the government had spent nearly ₹5,000 crore to purchase nearly 24 lakh VVPATs, only slips from approximately 20,000 VVPATs could be verified.

The petitioner said many questions have been raised by experts with regard to VVPATs and EVMs and the fact that large number of discrepancies between EVM and VVPAT vote count were reported in the past.

“So it is imperative that voters should be allowed to physically drop VVPAT slip as generated by the VVPAT in a ballot box to ensure that a voter’s ballot has been ‘counted as recorded’,” the petition mooted.

Alternatively, the petitioner sought a direction to the EC to make the glass of the VVPAT machine transparent and the duration of the light long enough for voters to see the paper recording their votes cut and drop into the drop box.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.