SAT refuses to revoke rap against SEBI

Tribunal says duty-bound to bring ‘serious anomalies’ to SEBI’s notice, ensure such lapses don’t recur

Updated - July 20, 2018 10:54 pm IST

Published - July 20, 2018 10:40 pm IST - Mumbai

The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has refused to revoke its order in which it had sharply criticised the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for letting off Tata Finance Ltd. (TFL) despite finding serious violations in a 2001 preference share issue.

“We will be failing in our duty if these serious anomalies are not brought to the notice of SEBI with a view to ensure that such lapses do not occur again in the future,” said the tribunal.

SEBI had filed an appeal with SAT asking that the tribunal expunge the adverse remarks made in an order issued by it on May 30.

The tribunal had pulled up the capital markets regulator for not taking any action against Tata Finance despite senior SEBI officials finding serious violations in a preference shares issue that also led to the then managing director Dilip Pendse being barred from the capital markets for three years.

“SEBI has indulged in shielding the main culprits... which is detrimental to the interests of securities market,” SAT had said in the order issued on May 30.

While hearing the SEBI appeal, the tribunal said that it would, however, replace the words “for the reasons best known to SEBI” with the words “for extraneous reasons” in the earlier order.

‘No reason to delete’

“We see no reason to delete the observation made in our order that in the present case SEBI has not acted impartially, because once it was found that TFL has made false declaration in its letter of offer, then, unless there were compelling reasons to the contrary, SEBI was bound and liable to take action against TFL,” SAT ruled.

The case dates back to 2001 when SEBI received a complaint alleging that TFL had made false disclosures in the letter of offer for the rights issue of 9% cumulative convertible preference shares (CCPS). According to the complaint, TFL allegedly did not disclose in its document the losses incurred by its subsidiary Niskalp Investment and Trading Company.

A SEBI probe concluded that certain back-dating and reversal of trades was done at the behest of the then managing director Mr. Pendse who was also a former director of Niskalp, A. L. Shilotri, the then CEO of Niskalp, in connivance with broking firms, Pat Financial Consultants and Superior Financial Consultancy Services.

In June 2016, SEBI barred all four entities from the securities market for three years while further barring Mr. Pendse and Mr. Shilotri from holding any key managerial position in any listed company for three years.

SAT in its ruling on May 30 quashed the directions issued against Pat Financial and Superior Financial while warning them “to be careful in future while dealing in securities.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.