The Australian supremacy

March 31, 2015 02:09 am | Updated November 16, 2021 05:11 pm IST

If there were any doubts about Australia’s preeminence in cricket’s world order, those were ruthlessly >banished at the Melbourne Cricket Ground on Sunday. A fifth World Cup crown in 11 editions — each achieved in a different continent, between 1987 and now — confers an aura of supremacy as nothing else. Consider that Australia has made two other finals at the game’s quadrennial showpiece event, and you get a sense of a country that produces dynamic, match-winning cricketers who pass on bloody-mindedness from generation to generation. Michael Clarke’s men were slight favourites at the start of the current edition; hardly anyone in cricket circles picks against Australia in big tournaments, especially outside the subcontinent. Given the side was likely to play a majority of its matches at home — including the semifinal and final at Sydney and Melbourne respectively, stomping grounds where it has historically been hard to beat — it was no surprise that the smart money was on Australia regaining the title. But being fancied is one thing. To win and do it so often that it appears inevitable, particularly in big games, is the hardest challenge in professional sport.

Australia grew in strength through the tournament, as Clarke and the influential James Faulkner returned after injury-enforced absences. The one-wicket defeat to New Zealand when the sides >first met , Clarke said, was a wake-up call. But he knew, as did most who follow the game closely, that Australia had no business staying in the contest as long as it did. Other sides in the tournament took notice: the feared Australian will was apparent; all that remained was for its game rhythm to click into gear. Steve Smith and Mitchell Starc shone the brightest, the former batting with calm mastery in the knock-out matches, the latter creating chaos and panic in the opposition with searing left-arm pace. Both played vital parts in the final too, Starc removing the tone-setting Brendon McCullum and Smith ensuring that a small chase suffered no nerves. But this was an Australian side full of explosive game-breakers. Under Clarke, who left one-day cricket in a fairytale finish, the side played stirring, attacking cricket — much like the team it beat in the final. New Zealand looked like a heart-warming underdog story to the casual fan; in reality it has been the form side in one-day cricket over the last six months or so. Its vibrant, intelligent style of play established the World Cup’s zeitgeist with eight successive wins. A one-off final in unfamiliar Melbourne — after all its matches at home — proved too much, however. Australia was better on the day, as it so often is, but New Zealand proved that valour and imagination can bring the impossible within grasp.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.