“State pursuing development at expense of local communities”

March 12, 2011 04:17 am | Updated 04:17 am IST - Chennai:

Politicians of the ruling party are treated as VIPs in a public hearing for a coastal thermal power project in Nagapattinam; waterbodies are filled with garbage first and turned into plots later in Dindigul; forest lands along the Western Ghats are acquired despite the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers Act, 2006.

These are some of the ways in which the State pursues development at the expense of the rights of local communities and the environment, say activists worried by the trend.

According to them, the State acquires private land in the name of public purpose, at times even without consent by paying minimum compensation after years, and reserves all rights over the common land, belonging to local communities, stamping its sovereignty over its very own people, mostly the poor.

A group of select activists from across the State with experiences in protecting land, common resources and environment were asked to follow up on projects displacing and destroying the livelihoods of people or endangering the environment and “fight till the end.”

“The State keeps on acquiring through its agencies like SIPCOT or SIDCO and invariably it's the land of the poor people. The worst affected are urban poor, fishermen and Dalits with no land pattas whose livelihood patterns change,” says Ossie Fernandes, director, Human Rights Advocacy and Research Foundation (HRF).

“The State is not the owner of common land. It is the land of the people. But the State has developed this attitude that it can do as it pleased,” said P. Selvi, advocate, Madras High Court.

Cases could be filed under various sections of the IPC like 268 (public nuisance), 269 (negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life), 277 (fouling water of public spring or reservoir), 278 (making atmosphere noxious to health) and a few others, said Jesurethinam, convenor, Coastal Action Network (CAN).

M. Jeeva, director, Society for Integrated Rural Development (SIRD), said the best possible way to fight the SEZs was to fight for compensation which would postpone acquisition.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.