Petition in SC against one-man commission to probe Jayalalithaa’s death

Petition warns that with ‘an in-house inquiry there is every possibility of bias and tampering of records’

October 24, 2017 06:18 pm | Updated 06:21 pm IST - New Delhi

J. Jayalalithaa passed away on December 5, 2016

J. Jayalalithaa passed away on December 5, 2016

A petition was filed in the Supreme Court on Tuesday challenging the Tamil Nadu government's appointment of a one-man Commission of Inquiry headed by retired Madras High Court judge, Justice A. Arumughaswamy, to probe the death of AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa.

“Party MLAs are involved in the whole episode of hospitalisation, treatment, death of the former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Ms. Dr. J. Jayalalithaa. There is every possibility of influence, pressure, bias when it comes to a commission constituted by the state government themselves, the present commission cannot be expected to do an independent inquiry...” the petition filed by Chennai resident P.A. Joseph, represented by advocate G. Sivabalamurugan, alleged.

The petition, which arraigns the State government and the Legislative Assembly as respondents, said the “present inquiry is clearly an in-house inquiry and there is every possibility of bias and likelihood of tampering of records”.

The special leave petition was filed in the Supreme Court after the Madras High Court chose to dismiss the allegations in an order on October 4, 2017.

The petition in the apex court primarily contends that the Commission of Inquiry was set up by the Tamil Nadu government unilaterally without prior legislative debate or resolution.

The petition contended that the prior resolution by the Parliament or the State Legislative Assembly is mandated under Section 3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952.

Mr. Joseph termed the High Court order of October 4 as a “glaring illustration of the misinterpretation of Section 3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952”.

The petition in the apex court argued that High Court erred in holding that a resolution from the legislature was not mandatory and a mere opinion of the government itself was enough to constitute a commission under the 1952 Act.

The petition sought an interim ex-parte stay on the government orders issued on September 25 and September 27 for setting up the Commission of Inquiry.

“The Commission was fixed with a time limit of three months to submit its report. Hence there is a great urgency,” the petition said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.