How did you assess Sanjay Dutt’s conduct, High Court asks Maharashtra government

The court was hearing a PIL plea challenging regular paroles and furloughs granted to the actor when he was serving his sentence.

June 12, 2017 06:41 pm | Updated 09:46 pm IST - Mumbai

Actor Sanjay Dutt. A file photo.

Actor Sanjay Dutt. A file photo.

Months after actor Sanjay Dutt walked out of Yerwada Jail , the Bombay High Court on Monday directed the State to file an affidavit on what ground he was let out eight months before time.

A Division Bench of Justice R.M. Sawant and Justice Sadhana Jadhav was hearing a public interest litigation filed by Pradeep Bhalekar, chairperson of Samajik Karyakarta Saurakhan Samiti. The petition alleged that Mr. Dutt was given a special treatment by being allowed to go scot-free. There are 27,740 prisoners in the state who deserve to be released on the same ground. The petition also said the actor has already benefited a lot from furlough and parole.

“The remission granted to Mr. Dutt is wrong and illegal,” said the PIL.

Appearing for the petitioner, advocate Nitin Satpute said, “What was the good behaviour and conduct that were held as the ground for granting him remission and reducing his sentence? What about all the other convicts, especially those in petty offences, who are rotting in jail? They have also filed applications seeking remission, but there has been no order on those.”

A day after the jail superintendent announced that Mr. Dutt would be let out on February 25, 2016, Mr. Bhalekar had written a letter to acting Chief Justice V.K. Tahilaramani about this.

The court directed the government to file an affidavit on what defines good behaviour and who is the sanctioning authority of the pre-mature release. “Was the Deputy Inspector General of Police consulted or did the jail superintendent directly send his recommendations to the Governor? How did the authorities assess good behaviour?” The matter was adjourned to July 3.

According to the Maharashtra Home Department, he was given remission (reduction of sentence) on account of good conduct. During his time in jail, Mr. Dutt was granted parole of 90 days in December 2013 and later for 30 days.

The actor was convicted for illegal possession of an automatic assault rifle, part of cache of arms and ammunition that landed ahead of the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts in which 257 people were killed.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.