HC frowns over meat sale ban in Mumbai

Seeks response from the Maharashtra government and the municipal body on a petition challenging it.

September 10, 2015 06:04 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 01:18 am IST - MUMBAI:

A butcher cuts meat inside his shop in Mumbai on Tuesday. India's financial capital has banned the slaughter and sale of meat for four days this month following a demand from the strictly vegetarian Jain community, sparking outrage among meat-eaters already upset by a permanent beef ban imposed this year.

A butcher cuts meat inside his shop in Mumbai on Tuesday. India's financial capital has banned the slaughter and sale of meat for four days this month following a demand from the strictly vegetarian Jain community, sparking outrage among meat-eaters already upset by a permanent beef ban imposed this year.

The Bombay High Court said on Thursday that imposing a ban on animal slaughter and sale of meat for four days during the Jain festival ‘Paryushan’ was not feasible in a metropolitan city like Mumbai and sought response from the Maharashtra government and the municipal body on a petition challenging it.

A division bench headed by Justice Anoop Mohta was hearing a petition filed by Bombay Mutton Dealers Association challenging Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation’s (BMC) decision to ban the sale of meat for four days — September 10, 13, 17 and 18 — during the festival.

Covers mutton, chicken

While the ban on September 10 and 17 was as per the government’s directives, the Shiv Sena-Bharatiya Janata Party-run BMC imposed it on 13 and 18. The ban covers only the sale of mutton and chicken.

“Mumbai is a metropolitan city. Such straight ban on meat cannot be a formula. Ban is on slaughter and sale of the meat. What about other sources? What about packaged meat that is already available in the market?” the court asked.

The court suggested if the Jain community had a problem with animals being slaughtered in the open and displayed in shops, a direction can be issued against it.

The court posted the matter for hearing on Friday and asked the State government and the BMC to file short affidavits.

The court also sought to know from the civic body under which provision of law it imposed such a ban.

Decision ‘unconstitutional’

The petitioners have claimed that the decision wass unconstitutional as it affects the livelihood of a section of people and favours a small percentage of population. It also goes against the secular fabric of the Constitution, they have said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.