Obama says ‘not there yet’ on U.S., Russia deal on Syria violence

"I think it’s premature for us to say there’s a clear path forward, but there’s the possibility at least for us to make some progress."

Updated - October 18, 2016 02:11 pm IST

Published - September 04, 2016 10:16 am IST - Hangzhou

U.S. President Barack Obama in Hangzhou in eastern China's Zhejiang province, on Sunday.

U.S. President Barack Obama in Hangzhou in eastern China's Zhejiang province, on Sunday.

Obama, speaking on the sidelines of the Group of 20 economic summit in China, said the U.S. and Russia still have “grave differences” about what’s needed to end Syria’s civil war and which opposition groups are legitimate targets for the U.S. and Russian militaries. But he said “it is worth trying” to secure an agreement nonetheless.

“We’re not there yet,” Mr. Obama said. “I think it’s premature for us to say there’s a clear path forward, but there’s the possibility at least for us to make some progress.”

Mr. Obama’s comments came as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov are deep in talks over a deal to boost U.S. and Russian military cooperation to fight the Islamic State group and other extremists in Syria a step Moscow has long sought. The emerging deal is expected to also include provisions to ensure aid can reach besieged areas of Syria and steps to prevent Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government from bombing areas where U.S.-backed rebels are operating.

Though negotiators have been hopeful a deal could come together while world leaders are gathered in Hangzhou for the G20, that optimism has been tempered by the failure of previous ceasefire deals to hold. The U.S. has long been wary to increase military coordination with Russia in Syria’s civil war because it says Russia continues striking moderate, U.S.-backed opposition groups in a bid to prop up Mr. Assad. The U.S. wants Russia to focus exclusively on IS and al-Qaeda-linked groups.

“These are difficult negotiations,” Mr. Obama said, arguing that the scepticism was “understandable” given letdowns in the past.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.