SEARCH

News » International

Updated: May 7, 2013 04:55 IST
Ladakh stand-off

China silent on terms of accord

Ananth Krishnan
Comment (5)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
An aerial view of five tents erected by the Chinese in Indian territory recently.
PTI An aerial view of five tents erected by the Chinese in Indian territory recently.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry says it still needed "the latest information"

China on Monday confirmed that the frontier forces of both countries had "terminated the stand-off" in Ladakh, but declined to provide details over the terms of the settlement, which saw both sides withdraw from the Depsang plains to their original positions to end the three week-long stalemate.

"China and India have reached an agreement on resolving the incident in the western section of the border," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said in a statement on Monday evening.

"The frontier forces of the two countries have terminated the stand-off at the Tiannan River Valley area," the statement said, adding that both sides "moved forward and adopted a constructive and cooperative attitude and calmed the tensions through border-related mechanisms, diplomatic channels and border defence meetings" since the stand-off began last month.

Earlier on Monday, Ms. Hua, at a regular briefing, said both countries had “kept in mind the larger interests” of the bilateral relationship in addressing the stand-off, which was sparked on April 15 after Chinese soldiers set up tented posts.

The three-week-long face-off ended on Sunday evening after a series of flag meetings between the two sides and consultations between the Foreign Ministries.

The Ministry of External Affairs in New Delhi said on Monday both sides had “agreed to restore status quo ante” as of April 15, with flag meetings held “to work out the modalities and to confirm the arrangements.”

Asked if Chinese soldiers had withdrawn to their original positions prior to April 15, Ms. Hua did not provide details, only saying “the two sides have been constructive and cooperative” and had made “positive progress”.

China has maintained that its troops did not cross the Line of Actual Control, blaming differing perceptions of the line for the stand-off. But Indian officials say neither side had in the past set up tented posts in areas where claim-lines were overlapping, even if they had carried out patrols.

What prompted the Chinese troops to do so - a move seen by Indian officials as a provocation - remains unclear, with Chinese officials saying little more than the official line that their troops had not trespassed the LAC.

The Chinese side had in the flag meetings reportedly expressed objections to recent Indian fortifications in Ladakh, leading some analysts to suggest the incursion may have been a move to press India to halt recent moves to beef up infrastructure in border areas.

Ms. Hua said on Monday China believed that “maintaining peace and tranquillity in the border areas serves the common interests of the two sides”.

“China,” she said, "would like to work with India to reach a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable resolution to border issues at the earliest possible date".

Why should China speak when they have extorted concessions from the Indians.The silence may well have been requested by the weak UPA government to cover its misdeeds!!!

from:  Avinash
Posted on: May 7, 2013 at 04:02 IST

why dont we give kachaitheevu to China as compensation?

from:  ashokr
Posted on: May 7, 2013 at 01:30 IST

Two different versions of the same subject, one by Indian government claiming they
have solved the stand off and the other by Chinese side which says they have no full
report and are silent give rise to the doubt that all is not well as is being claimed.

from:  shanthanu
Posted on: May 6, 2013 at 22:22 IST

The Indian politicians are too busy bribing their way to personal prosperity while China is taking over the country few km at a time. Way to go India !!!

from:  Srinath
Posted on: May 6, 2013 at 21:59 IST

Perhaps an Indian newspaper has more weight to extract details about
terms of settlement from the Indian side?

from:  Karthik Krishnan
Posted on: May 6, 2013 at 20:54 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Reporter Alerts

WorldView with Suhasini Haidar


Extreme outcomes in the Great Game over Ukraine

The shooting down of MH17 is one of the most horrific consequences of the latest version of the "Great Game".

Free for all


An Uncritical Eye - "The World Before Her"

It’s a telling commentary that the media groups blacklisted any news on the film and the VHP chose to make it more popular!

The new movie is a thriller about an American woman who goes to Kolkata in search of her missing husband. As she gets closer to the truth, she finds herself at the centre of a dangerous conspiracy. »

Gujarat, Rajasthan and Punjab: The Need for a Border States Group

The aim of the research report by Tridivesh Singh Maini is to examine the approach of the political leadership, as well as the business community, in three ‘border States’ towards India-Pakistan ties.This paper has sought to look at a number of factors, which include politics, economics as well as security issues.Read Article »

  • facebook Facebook
  • twitter Twitter

Resources

More Resources »

Sunday Magazine

More Sunday Magazine »

Friday Review

More Friday Review »

Habitat

More Habitat »

Young World

More Young World »

O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in International

Israeli cabinet discusses U.S. ceasefire proposal

Israel’s security cabinet on Friday discussed a new ceasefire proposal for Gaza from US Secretary of State John Kerry, Israeli radio rep... »