HC: Consider replacing two reserved coaches with unreserved coaches in Pandian Express

Published - November 24, 2016 01:24 am IST - MADURAI:

The Madras High Court Bench here on Wednesday directed General Manager of Southern Railways to consider a proposal forwarded to him by the Divisional Commercial Manager here through Chief Commercial Manager (Passenger Marketing) for replacing two reserved coaches in Pandian Express, a superfast overnight express train operated between Madurai and Chennai, with unreserved coaches. A Division Bench of Justices S. Nagamuthu and J. Nisha Banu also directed the General Manager to take a decision on the issue within a week and report to the court by November 30 since the proposal had been made in the larger interest of the common man who travels in trains. “You cannot convert an entire train for upper class people alone. Trains are meant for the common man and the poor,” Mr. Justice Nagamuthu told the counsel for Southern Railways.

The interim orders were passed on a public interest litigation petition filed by R. Rajaselvam of Dindigul against reduction of the number of coaches in Pandian Express from 24 to 22 since August this year when Linke Hofmann Busch (LHB) coaches, designed on German technology, were introduced for the express train. The petitioner sought for a direction to Southern Railways to add two more unreserved coaches for the exclusive use of women and the physically challenged.

Initially, the counsel for railways opposed the plea on the ground that it was the prerogative of the railways to add or reduce the number of compartments in a train depending upon several factors such as passenger demand, technical feasibility and so on. He also produced a Supreme Court verdict and contended that no one could file petitions in courts and seek a direction to increase or decrease the number of coaches since they were issues that could be decided only by competent authorities. However, refusing to accept his arguments and pointing out that the apex court verdict was not applicable to the facts of the present case, the Division Bench directed him to persuade the officials concerned to add two more coaches to the train if there were no technical hurdles in doing so. It was only after that, the counsel reported back that the Divisional Commercial Manager had sent a proposal for replacing two reserved coaches with unreserved coaches.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.