Cities » Kochi

Updated: September 10, 2013 13:07 IST

Delhi court finds ‘missing links’ in Sreesanth case

Staff Reporter
Comment (2)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
S. Sreesanth. File Photo
S. Sreesanth. File Photo

Lawyer Rebecca John said the court’s observations have strengthened the player’s case.

Indian pacer S. Sreesanth’s hope of being acquitted of the charge of spot-fixing in the last season of the Indian Premier League and returning to the cricket field received a shot in the arm on Monday with the Patiala House Court of Delhi finding missing links in the investigations by the Delhi police special cell.

A composed Sreesanth told The Hindu that he was patient and has faith in the judiciary. “By god’s grace, my training is progressing well and I am looking forward to get back to the cricket field,” he said.

Sreesanth’s counsel and senior Supreme Court lawyer Rebecca John said that the court’s observations on Monday have strengthened the player’s case. Stating that the court didn’t take up the police’s plea for the cancellation of bail of Sreesanth, Ms. John said the fact that the court found it fit to grant bail to the likes of Ajit Chandila, who was denied bail earlier, rules out the possibility of cancellation of Sreesanth’s bail. Senior High Court lawyer and family friend of Sreesanth, K. Ramkumar who was in Delhi as a mark of support to the cricketer, said that the court observed missing links in the investigation and expressed doubt whether it is progressing in the right direction. “The court also didn’t find any reason to invoke the provisions of the dreaded Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against the players including Sreesanth,” he said.

Mr. Ramkumar said that the court’s decision to grant bail to the likes of Ajit Chandila was proof of the police’s inability to produce substantial evidence to prove the charges. The case has been posted for October 7.

More In: Kochi

Yes! This is something to be proud about. It is important that holes
will be picked in the police case and finally nothing will be proved
against any crook.

It really doesn't matter if you're crooked. After all the Court would
have held you not guilty- right?

A gentlemen's game in the hands of crooks and bookies.

from:  Sundar
Posted on: Sep 10, 2013 at 14:22 IST

the case of Sreesanth was a media highlighted case where the media
channels repeatedly broadcasted the Srisanth episode putting pressure
on police and investigating agencies to act in hurry...these media
channels must be restrained from highlighting any criminal case
against any person as it instigates the people of the country putting
pressure on investigating agencies which results in miscarriage of
justice when the police has been burdened to investigate the cases no
pressure should be mounted on police to do the jobs in
hurry.....because at many times due to media trials the right decision
in the case cannot be reached into by the investigating
agencies....court must ban on the media trial.....

from:  SP
Posted on: Sep 10, 2013 at 14:18 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor






Recent Article in Kochi

Arrested Russian DJ may be drug peddler: police

A packet of brown-coloured powder was recovered from his possession »