HC stays order upholding JNU admission policy

Hope for students opposing policy based on UGC-2016 gazette notification rules

April 26, 2017 01:15 am | Updated 01:15 am IST - NEW DELHI

NEW DELHI, 12/07/2016: A view of Delhi High Court, in New Delhi on Tuesday. 
Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

NEW DELHI, 12/07/2016: A view of Delhi High Court, in New Delhi on Tuesday. Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

The Delhi High Court has stayed its single judge order upholding Jawaharlal Nehru University’s (JNU) admission policy for M.Phil and Ph.D courses based on UGC-2016 regulations.

The July 2016 regulations of the University Grants Commission (UGC) had put a cap on the number of students per professor/supervisor in M.Phil and Ph.D courses in all universities.

A single judge of the HC had held that the JNU admission policy was bound by the UGC regulations and the university had to accept them without any deviation.

It had given the finding while dismissing a plea of some students, who had challenged JNU’s admission policy stating that the university can tweak the guidelines to suit its own needs and educational standards.

‘Wide ramifications’

However, a two-judge Bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Anu Malhotra, on an appeal filed by JNU students, has stayed “the effect and operation of the findings on law” of the single judge till April 28.

The Bench passed the interim order stating that the single judge “has given findings and made absolute propositions of law which would have wide ramifications”.

“The appellant has made out a prima facie case so far as the reading of the Entries in the Lists in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India is concerned... it is directed that till the next date of hearing, there shall be a stay of the effect and operation of the findings on law of the single judge,” said the Bench.

The Division Bench was informed that the single judge order of March 16 was “premised on a completely erroneous reading of the entries in the Lists in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India”.

The appeal said the single judge had erred in holding the JNU Act a result of exercise of powers under the Concurrent List when in fact it was enacted in exercise of power under Entry 11 of the List II/Entry 65 of List I.

The appeal also said that the single judge has erroneously granted supremacy to the applicability of the UGC Act over the JNU Act.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.