Disclose all records related to denotification of Wakf properties : CIC tells Centre

April 01, 2016 12:00 am | Updated 05:42 am IST - NEW DELHI:

The Central Information Commission has directed the Central Government to disclose all records related to the UPA government’s decision to de-notify 123 Wakf properties which enabled their title to be transferred to the Delhi Wakf Board.

Information Commissioner Yashovardhan Azad rejected the contention of the Union Ministry of Urban Development that the issue of transfer of properties, being a matter of policy is under reconsideration consequent to the directions passed by the Delhi High Court.

“Every decision of the Council of Ministers precedes deliberation and due consultative process. Any subsequent decision modifying or altering the earlier decision would be preceded by a consultative process ‘distinct’ from the earlier one. Thus, the proposition that a settled policy decision of the Council of Ministers gets unsettled merely by an act of reconsideration is untenable,” Mr. Azad said in his order.

Hearing the plea of activist Subhash Agrawal, he said once a decision is taken by the Council of Ministers, the matter gets over and any subsequent reconsiderations of the earlier decision would not get the benefit of exemption as contemplated under section 8(1)(i) of the RTI Act for records forming part of it.

“However, exemption would be permissible for the records forming part of subsequent consultative process in consequence of any reconsideration, decision whereof is yet to be taken. Hence, the plea of Section 8(1)(i) is not maintainable in the present set of facts,” he said.

The Information Commissioner said the plea of the government that information could not have been disclosed since the information pertained to a Cabinet decision facing challenge in Delhi High Court, at the relevant time is “grossly misplaced”.

“Clause (b) to Section 8(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, would have been applicable, had the court of law seized with the matter forbade disclosure of information expressly or revelation of information sought would have constituted contempt of court. Thus this plea of respondent is also found unsustainable,” he said. Section 8(1)(b) exempts disclosure of information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law or tribunal or the disclosure of which may constitute contempt of court.

About 60 of these 123 properties are owned by the Land and Development Office (L and DO) under the Urban Development Ministry while the rest are with the Delhi Development Authority.

The decision had enabled the Wakf Board to take a call on the properties including selling them. These properties are spread over prime locations in the Capital: in and around Connaught Place, Mathura Road, Lodhi Road, Man Singh Road, Pandara Road, Ashoka Road and Janpath. -- PTI

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.