Historically, there has been a well-marked place and role for loud and un-modulated Carnatic music. Amplification of sound has not been integrated organically into the genre.
Although the word “aesthetic” may immediately evoke a fuzzy idea, most musical genres have a well-defined and well-orchestrated aesthetic that is readily understood by the initiated. For example, a rock concert is charged by an atmosphere of raw power, high volume, a deep rumbling bass and the wailing of intentionally distorted electric strings, not to speak of sundry special effects on voices, instruments, visuals, lighting and so forth. All this is part of a carefully orchestrated aesthetic that belongs to the genre and is loved by its aficionados. Likewise, the warm, intimate and subtle sounds of a string quartet are part of its intended aesthetic. Any deviation from the intended aesthetic of the genre, for example, an eardrum shattering loudness in a string quartet performance, or quiet subtlety in a rock concert, would be rejected by its followers.
Which brings up the obvious question — is there a well-developed Carnatic aesthetic? The Chennai Carnatic concert experience is most often marked by high volume and it is not uncommon to see a little jostling amongst the performers on stage for individual volume and requests from the audience for even more volume. Consequently, there's an overall distortion and a general loss of fidelity and subtlety. Is all this part of a carefully orchestrated aesthetic or is it the chaotic end result of a thoughtless stampede of circumstances and individual priorities?
Historically, there has been a well-marked place and role for loud and un-modulated Carnatic music. For example, Nagaswaram music, which was performed in and around temples, that is to say, mainly in the open air. Again, the post-trinity, pre-amplification era of the late 19th and early 20th centuries saw the rise of many great Carnatic musicians, mainly male vocalists, who excelled in the art of kutcheri performance. Their performances were mainly under open-air pandals, temple mandapams or sometimes, royal chambers. There was no amplification and from all accounts, they sang in pleasing but un-modulated high-pitched voices that carried far but presumably did not leave much room for aesthetic subtleties. Concurrently, there was also a place in the Carnatic world for soft, well-modulated, aesthetically subtle chamber music performed by female singers, court musicians, vainikas and other instrumentalists.
Flamboyant styles
Today, all these previous sub-genres of Carnatic music have coalesced into an uneasy whole called Carnatic concert music. Further adding to the internal diversity of the genre is the evolution over the last century of new and flamboyant styles of singing and instrumental techniques, as well as the introduction of new instruments.
Amplification has been the chief catalyst for the coalescing. While amplification has led to obviously spectacular gains in many areas, it has not been integrated organically into the genre. It has been approached in a cavalier manner, either willfully or unwittingly, by all concerned parties — musicians, organisers and the audience. To take the most extreme case, Chennai often witnesses, without controversy, the application of full amplification to indoor Nagaswaram and Tavil concerts!
If the Chennai Carnatic concert experience is unsatisfactory from an aesthetic standpoint, it could be instructive to examine other traditional genres which appear to have migrated more gracefully from the pre-amplification era to present times, for instance, Western classical music and Hindustani music. Perhaps the attention paid in those genres to stage décor and creating an atmosphere, at a level unknown to Carnatic music except in rare and elite venues like Kalakshetra, is indicative of an overall preoccupation with aesthetics. But looking at the performers themselves — the level of maturity of a performing ensemble, particularly a small one, determines if the whole (concert experience) is greater than the sum of the parts or quite the opposite. One needs look no further than an average string quartet performance or a Hindustani concert to get a sense of mutually reinforcing team spirit that creates a wholesome whole.
No doubt some of the jostling for individual volume sometimes seen in Carnatic concerts comes from inadequate or absent monitors and thereby an artiste's inability to hear one's own singing or playing, something so vital and indispensable to the artiste, but often totally not understood by organisers. It is not an easy matter and requires highly trained audio professionals to balance vastly disparate voices and/or instruments. Further, confusing the matter, artistes often bring along their own audio equipment which may be incompatible with the overall audio ensemble. Recent economic growth has led to overall improvements in sabha infrastructure and some have invested in good audio equipment but there still remains the challenge of finding and recruiting qualified technicians who have the requisite background in music and sound; there must be an overall acknowledgement that good sound is not a chore or the mere flick of a knob but rather a labour of love of specially trained individuals.
Audience discipline is a serious lacuna in Chennai Carnatic concert venues; some lapses are easier to condone than others. For example, walking in and out between pieces, if done unobtrusively, is more forgivable than ringing cell phones or side bar conversations. Arguably, this lack of focus and discipline leads to a hankering for higher and higher volumes and a gradual spiral of desensitisation.
Things can only get better for Carnatic concert music. There's an aesthetic dimension, of which an occasional glimpse is vouchsafed at the rare intersection of a sensitive and well-coordinated team, a good auditorium, good audio equipment, good technicians and a disciplined audience. If all parties work on it constantly, this can be established as the Carnatic norm and all can be proud of it and richer for the experience.
In part 2, the challenge posed by the internal diversity of the Carnatic genre in being able to define a universal Carnatic concert aesthetic will be discussed.
(The author is a biomedical design engineer with a keen interest in the design of acoustic and wind musical instruments and can be reached at udayshankar10@gmail.com)
Keywords: Carnatic music, Margazhi music season 2011







You are right. A sensitive, well co-ordinated team with good auditorium, good sound system and well disciplined audience will certainly help us experience the aesthetics in carnatic music. A detailed and well written article!
Great article with some very valid points. Having worked with artist and sound for classical concerts for 10 years, I think there are many aspects that need to be considered. For example when I setup sound - I have two different monitor mix for the stage, one mix for the audience. Volume control for each mix is different. Lastly I have a totally different mix for recording for archival. I think we need amplification because it can reach a larger audience. Our artists must understand that "Sound OR audio check" is a necessity not a choice. Audio check can take a good 30 to 60 minutes to achieve the correct balance for stage and for audience. As the author Udayshankar suggests, audio setup and management is a "labour of love of specially trained individuals" .The article focuses only on carnatic, I would say it is the problem with "Indian Classical Music" (Carnatic and Hidustani). The problem gets really bad when jugalbandi's are involved. I dread sound set up for jugalbandi
The indiscipline of audience these days is main reason for the system level to rise.Earlier we used to enjoy music in Sabhas with patrons enjoying every bit of the performance on stage.A receptive quiet and appreciative audience in mid-size auditorium with good sound system can easily sustain high levels of Carnatic music.Herein I cannot understand the interruption of Kutchery by applause at the end of each alapana.This was started to encourage the budding artistes not in the concerts of renowned artistes.Like the Mount Road lost its avenue of trees for road-widening prior to the Queen's visit to Madras Carnatic music has also undergone vast changes with a mixed bag good and bad.But the entire lot of musicians has undeniably contributed to the poularity and enrichment of Carnatic Music.
Unless one knows the lyrics of the vocal songs one cannot understand the instrumental music however well played by anyone. I was thinking the sound effect should itself lift one's soul to appreciate the sound and enjoy the music by not dwelling the meaning or the lyrics. Aum Shantih
in a review (I forget which paper) ... "A foreigner stood up and asked if everyone in the audience was deaf."
(It wasn't me. Honest)
Oh, how I sympathise, though. Carnatic music, with one or two specific exceptions, is a gentle music which uses acoustic instruments. Amplification should never, ever, hide that fact --- yet, in almost every hall, it completely obliterates it.
Please... Let us stop putting up with this.
I wonder why all this mumbo jumbo and delving in the psychoacoustic perception. We all should remember that our music originated from the precincts of temples and royal courts. Whereas the former had wide acclaim and impact, the latter was reserved only for select elite. Are we now completely in discussing about the latter?
Whereas the audience discipline has been talked about, I see not a word about on stage discipline by the artistes. If all the technology surrounding the artiste and the audience has evolved, what about the artiste's on stage discipline?
This article is very relevant for how concerts should be, in an ideal environment. Very few halls have the right acoustics, and fewer concerts have the right balance between lead performer and accompaniments. Having attended classical western concerts at the Met and the Lincoln Center in New York, I would state that (1) Audience discipline is sadly lacking in India, (2) a kutcheri is a team effort and artists need to work with each other over a period of time and perfect nuances -we seem to have a plug-and-play approach where pakkvadhyam artistes improvise on the fly!
Additionally, I believe that Indians become tonally deaf thanks to noise levels in their daily environments.
An article which reflects the present condition of Carnatic Music concerts.Artists and concert organizers should read this.
Thanks for a great range and depth of coverage! Sir, allow me to coin a definition of "Carnatic" as follows: Classically-structured, Amplification-dependent, Repertoire-heavy, Novelty-hungry, Argument-infested, Techno-savvy, Indian-yet-internationalised, Chennai-headquartered, MUSIC!
An excellent article and I totally agree with the author and believe that the 'total'experience of the concert will be enhanced by his suggestions. Furthermore, the participating artists like the vocalists, violinists and the mridhangists should understand their role in the performance to enhance the whole concert.
Well written Uday. Listener discipline will go a long way in improving the aesthetic experience as will proper usage of audio equipment.
A very valid point well presnted. Some of our mridangam vidwans drown out the vocalists; they should learn team work from past stalwarts like Palghat Mani and Pazhani Subbudu.
That amplification, not always supported by scientific 'balancing' of audio frequencies, acoustics of the auditorium, and broadly speaking, 'expertise', results in the unsatisfactory experience. Rest of the observations, from evolution of stage performances, to maturity of the ensemble, and what actually constitutes a kutcheri are all accurate. This reader does not agree with the Hindustani music comparison; it is no different from the Carnatic. Western classical music places that importance on fidelity of the note(s) as well as the harmony. So, somewhere it gets better managed before the 'consumption'. Overall, agree with the premise of this well-written piece. Give me a quiet room, preferably dimly lit, a reasonable home audio system to play classical Carnatic kutcheris of yester-years with one percussion and another accompaniment with no further disturbances including modern day technological ones, and I'll be happy. Now, if only I could understand all compositions in 5 languages!
Having grown up amidst this 'aesthetic', to use the author's term, for decades in Madras, and having continued the same outside the country for an even longer period now, one can opine about the 'volume' effect. The author delves into this on stage accurately. From the audiences' perspective, two factors stand-out. Most Indians are hard of hearing from circumstances, habits and up-bringing, never having tested for hearing loss. But that's not the real issue. The lack of discipline in maintaining silence -- both outwardly in not making a(ny) sound and more importantly inwardly in being in a state of mental quietude -- prevents enjoying the music as an upasana. The need to constantly 'chew' something (eat) does not allow fidelity in the internal sound processing; the ear-nose-throat connection in physiology is but nature. Denial of these is 'transferred', blame laid where it does not belong, requiring a greater amplification than necessary. This then becomes a vicious cycle, a Cath-22.
Please Email the Editor