PNB fraud may wipe out profit

Affected amount is more than 10 times lender’s 9-month net income of ₹1,134 cr.

February 15, 2018 10:50 pm | Updated February 17, 2018 03:49 pm IST - Mumbai

 PNB may have to bear liability for issuing LoUs in favour of 3 firms run by Nirav Modi.

PNB may have to bear liability for issuing LoUs in favour of 3 firms run by Nirav Modi.

The ₹11,500-crore fraud at state-owned Punjab National Bank (PNB) could have a significant impact on its profitability, which is already under pressure due to an increase in bad loans.

Not too long back, in the January-March quarter of 2016 (FY2015-16), the lender had reported a record quarterly loss of ₹5,370 crore due to a jump in bad loans. As part of its plan to bolster capital at state-run banks, the government had recently decided to infuse into PNB ₹5,473 crore, which is less than half the amount involved in the fraud.

The country’s second-largest lender had reported a net profit of ₹1,134 crore for the first nine months of the current financial year — a growth of only 6.7% over the same period of the previous year. The bank reported gross non-performing assets of ₹57,519 crore as of end December, which was 12.1% of its total advances.

Since PNB had issued Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) in favour of three companies run by Nirav Modi — Solar Exports, Stellar Diamonds and Diamond R Us — for availing buyers’ credit, PNB may have to bear the liability and pay the other banks such as Allahabad Bank and Axis Bank.

“We are already in discussion with all the lenders,” Sunil Mehta, MD & CEO of PNB, said at a news conference. “If the entire onus is on us, we are not going to back away from it. We don’t have any funded exposure as of now, but whatever is our liability that will be worked out under the investigation... we will take action,” he said.

Banking sources said PNB had already made some payments to other banks.

‘Weak systems’

“The amount involved is substantial,” Edelweiss wrote in a note to its clients. “But more worrying is the stark process lax and repeated instance of similar frauds.

“PSU banks continue to grapple with weak systems, raising questions on why the processes are not centralised, unlike most private banks where bypassing CBS [core banking solution] is not easy,” Edelweiss said.

The ₹11,500-crore fraud at state-owned Punjab National Bank (PNB) could have a significant impact on its profitability, which is already under pressure due to an increase in bad loans.

Not too long back, in the January-March quarter of 2016 (FY2015-16), the lender had reported a record quarterly loss of ₹5,370 crore due to a jump in bad loans. As part of its plan to bolster capital at state-run banks, the government had recently decided to infuse into PNB ₹5,473 crore, which is less than half the amount involved in the fraud.

The country’s second-largest lender had reported a net profit of ₹1,134 crore for the first nine months of the current financial year — a growth of only 6.7% over the same period of the previous year. The bank reported gross non-performing assets of ₹57,519 crore as of end December, which was 12.1% of its total advances.

Since PNB had issued Letters of Undertaking (LoUs) in favour of three companies run by Nirav Modi — Solar Exports, Stellar Diamonds and Diamond R Us — for availing buyers’ credit, PNB may have to bear the liability and pay the other banks such as Allahabad Bank and Axis Bank.

“We are already in discussion with all the lenders,” Sunil Mehta, MD & CEO of PNB, said at a news conference. “If the entire onus is on us, we are not going to back away from it. We don’t have any funded exposure as of now, but whatever is our liability that will be worked out under the investigation... we will take action,” he said.

Banking sources said PNB had already made some payments to other banks.

‘Weak systems’

“The amount involved is substantial,” Edelweiss wrote in a note to its clients. “But more worrying is the stark process lax and repeated instance of similar frauds.

“PSU banks continue to grapple with weak systems, raising questions on why the processes are not centralised, unlike most private banks where bypassing CBS [core banking solution] is not easy,” Edelweiss said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.