Buildings that mimic nature

The 2018 Pritzker Prize winner speaks of a biological approach to architecture

December 30, 2018 09:41 am | Updated 09:41 am IST

When culture and recreation come together communities emerge.When communities become societies a settlement is formed.In those realities we inhabit our aspirations of togetherness.

Sustainable cities are like a forest: ever-growing and diverse. In a forest, each branch, each trunk, each tree is unique, blossoming in its own way. Yet everything is connected. Everything in the forest has its role in a cosmic symphony. The city is no different.

The city, too, is an organism, both stable and fluid, static and constantly transforming. Humans are a part of the city’s inner mechanism, just as our cells are a part of us. Streets act as veins, connecting us to a network of life similar to a bio-diverse forest.

So why don’t we see our cities, towns and hamlets as biotechnological entities? Why don’t we plan and build them in natural ways that reignite the spirit of community, the spirit of a positive participatory culture?

Fine balance

Consider Jaipur, where Maharajah Sawai Jai Singh II ruled in 18th century India. He envisioned the city as a paradise on earth. Taking into account the constantly changing climate, as well as the movement of the sun, the king created a city built around guilds and clusters of sustainable, cooperative housing. As Jaipur cultivated the body, the mind and the spirit, it thrived socially, economically and culturally.

Jaipur recalls the ancient vastu purusha mandala: a philosophy of design that aims to create a balanced and healthy environment. This ancient science shaped most of India’s traditional settlements, where seasonal activities such as festivals and fairs take place. The mandala adapts to totally different climates and places, and, in turn, inspires them.

Unfortunately, we have forgotten this approach to architecture and design, following instead the prevailing planning model of big budgets, large-scale structures and isolated behaviours. Consequently, our habitations have become fragmented and we fail to see the city’s infrastructure and life in an integrated way.

Instead of building more megastructures — which constantly consume time, energy, and human and natural resources — should we not follow a more natural, biological approach to architecture that would foster small but comprehensive clusters of settlements and perhaps create a new world?

These smaller settlements would be sustainable and replicable. They would be full of energy and vitality, but they would not grow beyond a certain size. They would possess the same virtues as a bio-diverse network.

Such settlements would not waste time or energy or natural resources. The inhabitants would have global skills and a suitable, fulfilling lifestyle. This, as a result, could help salvage our planet from the present disasters and disparities that spawn anxiety and doubt about the future.

Often, in ancient towns and cities, which are socially, economically and culturally well-knit, we are struck by a strange, unexpected silence and slowness. Our desire to push, to achieve, to conquer dwindles, and we think more of how nature connects us and how we can share and revere our intrinsic selves.

Other aesthetic measures of such settlements are grace, love, compassion and humility. To animate a settlement one must create humble and tender connections, which encourage humans to come together and feel themselves a part of a larger order, a part of Mother Earth.

Soul connection

In ancient Indian texts, the sthapati (the architect or planner) has to be aware of the sustainable cycles of nature, following the laws of time and energy, just as our ecosystem does. The sthapati is obliged to integrate this natural flow with the lives of a settlement’s inhabitants. This method of interdependent planning allows for cultural activities and social integration. This form of sustainable architecture gives all individuals, regardless of class or creed, the ability to connect with their true natures.

Isn’t this why some Japanese homes have a bonsai tree to remind them of their connection to the eternal mystery of existence?

Today, we are globally connected but we are lost spiritually. Prana, the subtle energy that can only be felt, is the missing link that, if ignited, could enliven the spirit of the community again.

Can we not apply these planning philosophies in the present to create a lasting environment of positive participatory culture?

In 2018, the author became the first Indian to win the Pritzker Prize.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.