Can doctors judge quality of medicines?

Doctors’ objections to prescribing medicines by generic names fly in the face of a recent report on substandard drugs

May 14, 2017 12:02 am | Updated 12:02 am IST

In a surprise move on April 17, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that his government will soon make it mandatory for doctors to prescribe medicines by generic names. The decision was to ensure drug prices remain affordable and patients get a wider bouquet of options instead of being forced to purchase a particular brand.

Within days, the Medical Council of India (MCI), apex regulator of the sector, issued a notice reminding doctors that according to a 2016 amendment to the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, they are supposed to prescribe drugs with generic names.

Doctors reacted sharply, insisting that branding of drugs assured them on quality. The Indian Medical Association (IMA) issued a statement: “The judgment to choose a rational drug and its format vests only with the Registered Medical Practitioners. This right of the medical profession is sacrosanct."

Survey on substandard drugs

As the debate about affordable medicines gets upstaged by drug safety, it is instructive to look at the findings of a recent report on substandard and spurious drugs by the National Institute of Biologicals for the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation. Released in late February, the report established that branded medicines are in no way assurance of quality.

The report, based on a one-of-a-kind drug survey conducted from 2014-2016 and in which 47,954 samples of drugs were collected from across the country and put to test, revealed that while only 13 samples (0.024%) were spurious, as many as 1,850 samples (3.16%) were substandard. It also showed that while in retail outlets 3% of the medicines were substandard, in government pharmacies the figure was a staggering 10%. As many as 26 out of 46 samples (56.52%) from the Maharashtra facility of pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Limited were found to be substandard in the survey. “Pfizer is a big name in the industry. If so many of their medicines are substandard, then it shows that big brands are no guarantee of good quality,” says S. Srinivasan of All India Drug Action Network.

Moved by the evidence from this report, the Health Ministry has initiated action against defaulting pharmaceutical companies. “We have sent notices to drug manufacturers whose products have been found substandard. Some companies have already surrendered licences,” says K.L. Sharma, Joint Secretary, Health Ministry. The ministry refused to give details of companies which have been issued notices or have surrendered licences.

Apart from Pfizer, several other famous brands might receive flak from the ministry. Twenty-three samples of Cipla Limited from different manufacturing units across India were found to be substandard in the survey. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. had nine substandard samples, while Zydus Healthcare Limited had six. All six out of six samples of generics major Mercury Laboratories Limited from Gujarat were substandard.

Pfizer’s spokesperson maintains only two of their samples were found substandard and that upon independent analysis, both were found to be of standard quality. “We are engaging with the government on this report to better understand the details of the alleged NSQ [substandard] samples, testing protocols and methodologies while also responding with these facts.”

Need for constant monitoring

Experts maintain that the government, along with the World Health Organization (WHO), must push drug companies to comply with the latter’s good manufacturing practices. “The survey is timely and is in line with the experience of treatment providers suggesting that substandard medicines — genuine drugs that fail to meet standards for quality, strength, purity or packaging — are a much bigger problem in the developing world including India and that measures to address substandard drugs are important to protect public health and patients. The capacity of the State FDAs [Food and Drug Authorities] to start performing technical evaluation before new manufacturers of older medicines are licensed, and actively identify and remove substandard drugs from the supply chain,” says Leena Menghaney, a lawyer working on access to medicines.

A one-time drug survey might not be enough. The country needs regular surveys and longitudinal studies to weed out substandard medicines from government as well as retail shops. “Regular and periodic sampling of these drugs is a must with provision for urgent analysis and follow-up action within a prescribed time limit. Periodic inspection of the suppliers is also necessary,” says M. Bhaskaran, former Drugs Controller of Tamil Nadu.

While the debate about drug safety and generic prescription of drugs is polarised, all stakeholders admit that the Prime Minister’s announcement has opened a discussion about affordable medicines that was the need of the hour.

Jyotsna Singh is a Delhi-based freelance journalist, writing on public health and policy

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.