NGT seeks report on removal of invasive mussel species from Ennore-Pulicat wetland

Applicant claims the spread of the South American species has affected local species of prawns, even as the government body holds that the mussels is a local species and finds a mention in the Wildlife Protection Act

October 06, 2023 08:02 pm | Updated 08:21 pm IST - CHENNAI

Flamingos seen at Pulicat lake at Sriharikota near Chennai.

Flamingos seen at Pulicat lake at Sriharikota near Chennai. | Photo Credit: Jothi Ramalingam

The Southern Bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has asked the Fisheries Department and the Tamil Nadu State Wetland Authority to file a detailed report on the removal of invasive mussel species from Ennore-Pulicat wetland.

S. Kumaresan, a fisherman from Ennore, has filed an application stating that an invasive South American mussel species, Mytella strigata, has spread like a carpet over the riverbed, preventing prawns from grazing or burying themselves in the sediment. Referred to as kaaka aazhi locally, it is said to be wiping out the locally prevalent and commercially valuable yellow clams (manja matti) and green mussels (pachai aazhi).

Mr. Kumaresan sought a direction to the government to take urgent action against the spread of mussels to ensure that the wetland ecosystem and livelihood are protected. He said because of the invasive mussels, the river bottom is suffocated with one foot-deep sludge of black, foul-smelling slimy excreta.

The government pleader argued that kaaka aazhi is not an alien species as it has an entry in the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (WPA) and that the NGT does not have jurisdiction to hear any matters relating to the WPA, which is not listed in Schedule I of the NGT Act. Remarking that this aspect had to be examined in further hearings, the Bench comprising Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana and expert member Satyagopal Korlapati asked the authorities to file a comprehensive report in response to the application.

“Let the government furnish information as to whether the act of dredging had begun or any action plan had been prepared by the Fisheries Department,” the Bench ordered.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.