The war that never ends

How it went wrong for the U.S. in Afghanistan

March 19, 2018 12:15 am | Updated 12:15 am IST

When the U.S. sent troops to Afghanistan in October 2001 after the September 11 terrorist attacks, the plan was to retaliate against al-Qaeda, take down the the Taliban regime which provided asylum to the al-Qaeda leadership, and install a friendly government in Kabul.

But the war went on. After nearly 17 years, the government in Kabul is shaky, the Taliban controls much of the hinterlands, and al-Qaeda is operating from elsewhere.

Much has been written about this war, exploring what went wrong for the Americans. Carlotta Gall’s The Wrong Enemy: America in Afghanistan, 2001-2014 , Mark Mazzetti’s The Way of the Knife: The CIA, a Secret Army, and a War at the Ends of the Earth and Jeremy Scahill’s Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield are some of the notable books that deal with this topic.

Gall, who covered the Afghan war for the New York Times , points a finger at Pakistan for the mess that Afghanistan is in today. Pakistan offered support for the U.S.’s war efforts in Afghanistan but at the same time provided clandestine support to both the Taliban and al-Qaeda. She argues that supporting militant groups was part of Pakistan’s “30 years of strategic thinking”, and the U.S. failed to grasp this reality. By the time the U.S. realised Pakistan’s double game, it was reluctant to take action because it wanted Pakistan’s continued support in the war. Gall argues that the Inter-Services Intelligence, the Pakistani army’s spy wing, had supported Osama bin Laden throughout his hiding since 2001.

Mazzetti’s book offers insights into America’s secret wars in the region. He says the U.S.’s counterterror strategy has gone through major changes in the post-9/11 phase, and that the country became more reliant on intelligence and the secret operations of the Central Intelligence Agency. He says the CIA’s drone war can “carry out killing operations at the ends of the earth.”

Scahill argues in Dirty Wars that this strategy of fighting terrorism through targeted killings is basically flawed. He writes that the drone attacks and the high casualties as a consequence have increased resentment among the local populace, be it in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen or Mali where the ensuing chaos is a boon for militants.

As U.S. President, George W. Bush sanctioned these secret wars and his successor, Barack Obama, stepped them up. The result is a prolonged war with high civilian casualties and with no end in sight.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.