RTI scrutiny

April 05, 2019 01:20 am | Updated 01:20 am IST

The arguments put forth by the Attorney General, of the need to not have the judiciary under the ambit of the Right to Information Act are strange. Judicial exclusivity had never been envisaged by any of our Constitution makers. With the allegations made recently about the judiciary’s functioning, the RTI Act would serve as a master tool, making the justice delivery mechanism more immune to political pressure and accountable to the people. People have the right to know how the judiciary functions (Page 1, “‘RTI scrutiny will ruin judicial independence”, April 4).

Y. Meena,

Hyderabad

The attempt by the judiciary to wriggle out of the RTI radar is unacceptable. The arguments given in support of this are unconvincing. They equally apply to other civil servants. Therefore, the judiciary cannot claim preferential treatment. Instead, the judiciary should set an example by abiding by the RTI Act rather than finding excuses for not releasing information. How can there be an argument then to make sure the RTI Act applies to political parties?

R. Vidya Sagar,

Chennai

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.