Supreme Court to look into the curious case of ‘planted’ earrings

Court issues notice to Maharashtra Police after their records show that a murdered woman’s one set of earrings were found on two accused

February 03, 2024 09:34 pm | Updated 11:43 pm IST - NEW DELHI

A view of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. File

A view of the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi. File | Photo Credit: Sushil Kumar Verma

The Supreme Court has decided to examine the bail plea of a 22-year-old man who claims the Maharashtra Police planted a pair of gold earrings on him to frame him in a theft-and-murder case.

In fact, the man said the trinket was recovered months ago from another man whom the police said was his co-accused.

A Bench headed by Justice Hrishikesh Roy has issued notice to the State of Maharashtra.

The petitioner, Monu Kisanlal Kumar, is one of the two accused in the murder of a woman at a construction site in 2021. Kumar has been behind bars for two years now.

Though the Maharashtra Police panchnama shows the trinket was found on Kumar, his lawyers, Sriram Parakkat and Sana Raees Khan, drew the attention of the Bench to police records showing that the same piece of jewellery was recovered months ago from the co-accused in the case.

“On the recovery of the earrings on the basis of the statement made to the police, the counsel points out that this is highly improbable in as much as on November 26, 2021, the recovery of earrings is shown from accused No. 1. Curiously, the same article is shown to have been recovered from the accused No. 2, on January 15, 2022,” the top court recorded in its recent order.

According to the police, Kumar and his co-accused, Shivkumar, were interrupted by the victim during the theft. They stopped her from raising an alarm by fatally attacking her. The duo allegedly stole ₹30,000, a small bag containing identity documents, a chain and the victim’s gold earrings.

Kumar’s lawyers argue that the FIR was filed after a day’s delay and is based on hearsay. There was no eye-witness to confirm that he had played any part in the crime. The case against him was based on the statement given by Shivkumar, amounting to an extra-judicial confession. His name was maliciously roped in by the police, they said.

The top court has listed the bail plea after three weeks.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.